I can’t take credit for coining these terms. A person at another website I frequent did.
What is Obommunism? Barack Obama led communism, of course. Who are obommunists? Followers of Barack Obama of course.
Update: I wanted to add this yesterday, but the source for the comments was blogger at the Huffington Post. I wanted to wait until this stuff was carried by a real news organization before I put it up here. Here is the original source.
Newsbusters puts it into perspective better than I can:
Religion is the opiate of the masses. — Karl Marx, 1843
It’s not surprising that they get bitter, they cling to . . . religion . . . as a way to explain their frustrations. — Barack Obama, 2008
Has anyone else pointed out the striking similarity between Barack Obama’s recent statement about tough economic times driving people to religion and that of another person who preached change: Karl Marx?
Obama added guns and xenophobia to his list of proletarian elixirs for bitterness. But the fundamental point remains: Barack apparently doesn’t take religion, his own or anyone else’s, too seriously. It’s not a search for truth or an attempt to live in accordance with God’s word. It’s just a way to get by, a stupefacient that helps proles endure the pain of living in an economy unfairly dominated by the “haves.” Karl would concur.
So there you have it. The newsbusters link has another bit about one of BO’s mentors being a “noted member of the Communist Party USA.”
Michelle Obama said the other day about universal healthcare:
“If we don’t wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership…for how we want this country to work, then we won’t get universal health care,” she said.
“The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”
Things like the above just scratch the surface of not only what Obomunism is all about, but the Democratic party as well. It all boils down to, “The government (Democrat controlled that is) knows what is best for you.”
Don’t be fooled by a liberal telling you otherwise. Actions speak louder than words and liberals talk out of both sides of their mouths. From one side they will say they are about personal freedoms, civil rights, and equality for all. Out of the other side they support policies and policy makers that seek to control how you live your life and squash opposing opinions (Fairness doctrine).
Another example is liberals talking out of both sides of their mouths when it comes to “fear mongering.” They will denounce the Bush Administration for using fear mongering to get support for Operation Iraqi freedom, but out of the other side of their mouths they talk about the despair brought about by “Climate Change” or “Global Warming.”
My solution, short of voting for the candidate that opposes these ideals (notice I didn’t say McCain), is to reject liberal principles at every turn.