Lets speculate for a moment. If no one ever check on Gate’s house after the woman called the police he would probably be just as outraged that the while rouge cop cared so little that he wouldn’t check up on a potential burglary. The police are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

What we have here is just another race hustler. The facts are being completely ignored and no one is discussing the inappropriate comments made by Gates. Even the president, acknowledgeing he doesn’t know the facts, is discgracefully throwing the Cambridge police department under the bus.

All Gates, Obama, and his unwavering followers seem to be are eternal victims. People aren’t buying this load of BS put forth by these race hustlers and that is why Obama is now backpedaling as fast as he can.

I am elated that, one way or another, America is heading for a new frontier.  For example, scinece is getting better and better every day.  I particularly like statistics myself.  Studies such as this:

Is it OK to cheat on your taxes? A total of 57 percent of those who described themselves as “very liberal” said yes in response to the World Values Survey, compared with only 20 percent of those who are “very conservative.” When Pew Research asked whether it was “morally wrong” to cheat Uncle Sam, 86 percent of conservatives agreed, compared with only 68 percent of liberals.

Ponder this scenario, offered by the National Cultural Values Survey: “You lose your job. Your friend’s company is looking for someone to do temporary work. They are willing to pay the person in cash to avoid taxes and allow the person to still collect unemployment. What would you do?”

Almost half, or 49 percent, of self-described progressives would go along with the scheme, but only 21 percent of conservatives said they would.

When the World Values Survey asked a similar question, the results were largely the same: Those who were very liberal were much more likely to say it was all right to get welfare benefits you didn’t deserve.

The World Values Survey found that those on the left were also much more likely to say it is OK to buy goods that you know are stolen. Studies have also found that those on the left were more likely to say it was OK to drink a can of soda in a store without paying for it and to avoid the truth while negotiating the price of a car.

Another survey by Barna Research found that political liberals were two and a half times more likely to say that they illegally download or trade music for free on the Internet.

A study by professors published in the American Taxation Association’s Journal of Legal Tax Research found conservative students took the issue of accounting scandals and tax evasion more seriously than their fellow liberal students. Those with a “liberal outlook” who “reject the idea of absolute truth” were more accepting of cheating at school, according to another study, involving 291 students and published in the Journal of Education for Business.

A study in the Journal of Business Ethics involving 392 college students found that stronger beliefs toward “conservatism” translated into “higher levels of ethical values.” And academics concluded in the Journal of Psychology that there was a link between “political liberalism” and “lying in your own self-interest,” based on a study involving 156 adults.

Liberals were more willing to “let others take the blame” for their own ethical lapses, “copy a published article” and pass it off as their own, and were more accepting of “cheating on an exam,” according to still another study in the Journal of Business Ethics.

To me, science like that makes me feel all warm inside.

The Obommunists are celebrating wildly now that Obama has secured the nomination.  I am have previously been torn on this situation for two reasons.  One is, I don’t like McCain very much.  The second reason is that the abomination of an Obama presidency combined with a Democrat congress will handily ensure a 1984 come 2012.  I must admit that prospect is very tempting, but I find any harm to my fellow Americans for political gain very loathsome.  If the second reason comes to pass then I will be very sad, but my conscience will be clean in knowing that I had no hand in ushering in an era of increased and damaging social policies.

I realize that leftists could say the same about me supporting Bush’s policies for the past 8 years and I will probably concede to a lot of their critisicms.  However, we as a nation must realize that the fruits of our labor during the Bush administration may not come to pass for quite a while.  That is not to say that everything Bush has done has been for the better, far from it, but the opposite is false as well.

Change is inevitable.  I will continue in another post.

What is Obommunism? Barack Obama led communism, of course.  Who are obommunists?  Followers of Barack Obama of course.

Update:  I wanted to add this yesterday, but the source for the comments was blogger at the Huffington Post.  I wanted to wait until this stuff was carried by a real news organization before I put it up here. Here is the original source.

Newsbusters puts it into perspective better than I can:

Religion is the opiate of the masses. — Karl Marx, 1843

It’s not surprising that they get bitter, they cling to . . . religion . . . as a way to explain their frustrations. — Barack Obama, 2008

Has anyone else pointed out the striking similarity between Barack Obama’s recent statement about tough economic times driving people to religion and that of another person who preached change: Karl Marx?

Obama added guns and xenophobia to his list of proletarian elixirs for bitterness. But the fundamental point remains: Barack apparently doesn’t take religion, his own or anyone else’s, too seriously. It’s not a search for truth or an attempt to live in accordance with God’s word. It’s just a way to get by, a stupefacient that helps proles endure the pain of living in an economy unfairly dominated by the “haves.” Karl would concur.

So there you have it.  The newsbusters link has another bit about one of BO’s mentors being a “noted member of the Communist Party USA.”

Michelle Obama said the other day about universal healthcare:

“If we don’t wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership…for how we want this country to work, then we won’t get universal health care,” she said.

“The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more.”

Things like the above just scratch the surface of not only what Obomunism is all about, but the Democratic party as well.  It all boils down to, “The government (Democrat controlled that is) knows what is best for you.”

Don’t be fooled by a liberal telling you otherwise.  Actions speak louder than words and liberals talk out of both sides of their mouths.  From one side they will say they are about personal freedoms, civil rights, and equality for all.  Out of the other side they support policies  and policy makers that seek to control how you live your life and squash opposing opinions (Fairness doctrine).

Another example is liberals talking out of both sides of their mouths when it comes to “fear mongering.”  They will denounce the Bush Administration for using fear mongering to get support for Operation Iraqi freedom, but out of the other side of their mouths they talk about the despair brought about by “Climate Change” or “Global Warming.”

My solution, short of voting for the candidate that opposes these ideals (notice I didn’t say McCain), is to reject liberal principles at every turn.