For information on Google bombs read here.

Senate

Connecticut: Ned Lamont
Maryland: Ben Cardin
Michigan: Debbie Stanbenow
Missouri: Claire McCaskill
Montana: Jon Tester
New Jersey: Bob Menendez
Tennessee: Harold Ford
Virginia: James Webb

Democrat Held Seats

(CO-03): John Salazar
(GA-03): Jim Marshall
(GA-12): John Barrow
(IA-03): Leonard Boswell
(IL-08): Melissa Bean
(IL-17): Phil Hare
(IN-07): Julia Carson
(NC-13): Brad Miller
(PA-12): John Murtha
(WV-01): Alan Mollohan

Republican Held Seats

(AZ-08): Gabrielle Giffords
(CT-04): Diane Farrell
(CT-05): Chris Murphy
(CO-07): Ed Perlmutter
(IA-01): Bruce Braley
(IL-06): Tammy Duckworth
(IN-02): Joe Donnelly
(IN-08): Brad Ellsworth
(IN-09): Baron Hill
(FL-13): Christine Jennings
(FL-16): Tim Mahoney
(FL-22): Ron Klein
(KY-03): John Yarmuth
(NC-01): Heath Shuler
(MN-06): Patty Wetterling
(NM-01): Patricia Madrid
(NY-20): Kirsten Gillibrand
(NY-24): Michael Arcuri
(NY-26): Jack Davis
(OH-15): Mary Jo Kilroy
(OH-18): Zack Space
(PA-06): Lois Murphy
(PA-08): Patrick Murphy
(PA-07): Joe Sestak
(PA-10): Chris Carney
(VA-02): Phil Kellam
(WI-08): Steve Kagen

Click on each link as often as you feel up until the election.  If you don’t want to click on it here, be sure and go to the PTS’s comments section and click on the links there while they last.  Click on both if you want!

google, bomb, google bomb, democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, election, congress, senate, house, november

I can understand them being upset especially if what is being portrayed as false. I am skeptical of taking convicted and known liars words about what went on then, however. One scene, as described in the link above, does seem to be false. The scene has to do with Albirght tipping Pakistan off to missile being launched against OBL when the 9/11 commission report says that a member of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff tipped Pakistan off about the ordeal. Given that, at least some of the complaints are legitimate.

The only bone I have to pick with their complaining is their hypocrisy. Where were these people’s complaints when Michael Moore was producing fabrications about the Bush administration? I’ll tell you where they were, they (democrats) were inviting Michael Moore to sit in the presidential box at the Democratic National Convention.

Furthermore, Fahrenheit 9/11 was touted as a factual documentary and even won awards as such. “The Path to 9/11″ is being touted as a docudrama and specifically says that scenes are dramatized. Not that just because “The Path to 9/11″ may have fabrications does not make those fabrications ok. The point is that Democrats are selective in their criticisms.

Be sure and check out Michelle Malkin’s website where she illustrates’s the differences in how Republicans and Democrat bloggers are planning on commemorating the anniversary of 9/11.

I really don’t plan on watching the program. I have class on Monday so if I watched it on Sunday I would be left unsatisfied.

Update: John Hawkins at rightwing news.com puts it into perspective:

Having the Clinton Administration complain that they look bad in this mini-series is like a football team that lost a game 56-0 griping that the highlight reel on the news that night made them look bad. The truth is that the Clinton Administration didn’t take terrorism as seriously as they should have and did very little of note to prevent it. Since that’s the case, the Clinton Administration can’t possibly come off well in any sort of mini-series that accurately discusses what happened.

9/11, abc, albright, america, berger, clark, clinton, conservative, democrat, left-wing, liberal, malkin, michael moore, republican, september, “path to 9/11″