Archive for the ‘My Opinion’ Category

Talk Radio and Unintended Consequences

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

It’s no secret to anyone who frequents this blog that I’m supporting Mike Huckabee for President.  It’s also no secret to anyone who listens to talk radio that there are virtually no conservative talk show hosts who do.  On the contrary, many of them are openly trying to derail his candidacy.  I stopped listening to Mark Levin on my evening commute for that very reason.  Every time I turned on his show, it seemed like a non-stop barrage about bad Mike Huckabee and John McCain are for the Republican Party.  From what I’ve heard, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are hardly any better, although I haven’t been listening to them much lately either.

Are these relentless attacks on Huckabee having the desired effect?  Not for at least one other erstwhile listener.  I discovered this comment posted on a Reuters article about Huckabee gaining on Giuliani in the California race (posted by d_sh9456 on December 20, 2007, 7:32 PM):

“For the first time I have moved away from the conservative ‘Dark Side’ and now support Mike Huckabee for President. Just too many power hungry conservative Talk Show Hosts supporting the Wall Street Power Brokers and their candidates. Mike Huckabee has single handedly moved the election system into the light for all true conservatives and Americans by removing the ‘For Sale’ sign from Washington DC.”

I’m old enough to remember 20 years ago when Rush Limbaugh first went national. The immediate appeal of his show was not that he was telling people how to think, but rather that he was articulating the same perspective that so many of us already held but had never heard anyone voice before in the national media. We listened to him because he was one of us. The media elites eventually realized they could make a bundle of money by replicating his formula, and scores of Rush Limbaugh wannabes hit the airwaves.

Now fast forward to 2008. Along comes a presidential candidate who isn’t driven by focus groups or forced into the cookie-cutter Madison Avenue mold of what a presidential candidate should be like. The elites aren’t supporting him because he refuses to kowtow to them. He offers a tax proposal that would reward productivity but rob them of their precious tax shelters. His faith is not just a prop to gain the evangelical vote; he really believes. He cares more for the people on Main Street than the people on Wall Street. In short, Mike Huckabee speaks to so many of us because, like Rush two decades earlier, he’s saying what we believe at a time when everyone else is telling us that what we believe doesn’t matter.

I suspect that many, if not most, of the conservative talk show hosts will continue to attack Mike Huckabee until he either drops out of the race or surprises them all and wins the nomination. But the unintended consequence may be this: How many of us will still be listening?

Huckabee and the “Religious Right”

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

huckabee.jpgFollowing the surprisingly strong win of Mike Huckabee in the Iowa caucuses, pundits have begun to speculate whether this victory is a one-time shot, or perhaps something more.

On the one-shot wonder side, Ronald Kessler at newsmax.com opined that the Huck-a-boom “may be a fluke attributable largely to the fact that 60 percent of Republicans who voted in the caucuses described themselves as evangelical Christians.”

To be sure, the former Arkansas governor has tapped into a cohort of the electorate that has been largely underestimated by political pundits and taken for granted by the Republican Party.  Back in February, Jim Wallis at Time Magazine proclaimed that  The Religious Right’s Era Is Over. If the “Religious Right” is a top-down political movement within the Republican Party, which Wallis seems to imply, perhaps he is right. Traditional leaders of this movement (such as Pat Robertson), in an apparent effort to retain their seat at the political table, have compromised their core values by endorsing social liberals like Rudy Giuliani.

But the Evangelical Christians who came out for Huckabee in Iowa were not part of an organized movement. This was largely a bottom-up phenomenon, generated by word of mouth, guest sermons by Huckabee at local churches, and the Internet. Far from a fluke, Huckabee is replicating this winning strategy in other states, such as South Carolina, Florida, Texas and even Michigan.  In New Hampshire, a much more secular state than Iowa, Huckabee could exceed expectations by taking third place away from Giuliani.  Beyond New Hampshire, he has a much better chance of success.

But is Huckabee only the candidate of the “Religious Right”?  Not so, says Michael Medved, who points out that Huckabee beat Romney in Iowa among voters aged 17 to 29 (40% to 22%), 30 to 44 (39% to 23%) and over 65 (30% to 28%). He even beat Romney among female voters by a whopping 40% to 24%. If Huckabee can pull those kind of numbers among younger voters, as well as female voters, he’ll be a much more competitive going head-to-head against Obama, should he get the Democrat nomination. Huckabee also brings in voters on non-social issues, such as Second Amendment rights and the Fair Tax.

The Republican Convention this summer is still a long ways off, and there are likely to be a number of surprises along the way. But I don’t anticipate Mike Huckabee being eliminated from the race any time soon.

Everywhere we prospered when our talents were applied.

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

What other group, or culture can say the same? This guy I know from some of the places we write. He’s a retired Army guy. As you can see on the wall behind him he has earned his right to express an opinion. Lots of good songs wrote by this man. Take a little listen.

Christian “Leaders” and Political Endorsements

Sunday, November 25th, 2007

When I first heard the news that Richard Roberts had resigned his position as President of Oral Roberts University amidst allegations of financial misappropriation, I wasn’t particularly surprised.

Back in the 80’s, I read a book called Ashes to Gold (1983) by Patti Roberts, the first wife of Richard Roberts.  In this book, she described the priorities they lived by that contributed to their divorce:

Our success, our high-gloss way of living, our highly polished exterior gave us no refuge when the terrors of real problems hit, because our hope was in our empire.  Our desire was to protect our empire.  So all our effort went to “how does this look to the public?’ – not “how does this look to God?”  We turned our eyes to the public when we should have turned them to the wind and cried, “God, what responsibilities do we have to You?”

It seems that Roberts didn’t learn his lesson.  In 1987, two years after he was named executive vice president of ORU and six years before he succeeded his father as president, university regent Harry McNiven resigned from the Board of Regents because of misspending he had witnessed.  McNiven was recently quoted as saying, “It’s been 20 years that they’ve been doing the same things that I became aware of.”

The allegations lodged against Roberts include “a $39,000 shopping tab at one store for Richard Roberts’ wife, Lindsay, a $29,411 Bahamas senior trip on the university jet for one of Roberts’ daughters, and a stable of horses for the Roberts children.”

Apparently the Roberts empire included political influence as well as lavish lifestyle.  In 2006, he personally endorsed Randi Miller for mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma (the home of ORU), and allegedly required students in a government class to work on the Miller campaign (an allegation that Roberts denies).

Here’s a link to an AP article about the scandal:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071124/ap_on_re_us/oral_roberts_scandal

My guess is that Rudy Giuliani is thanking his lucky stars that it was Pat Robertson, and not Richard Roberts, who endorsed his campaign.

The VFW

Wednesday, November 21st, 2007

The VFW Last Saturday the Admiral and I went to the VFW in Amarillo for their early Thanksgiving dinner. They also had a country-dance going after the dinner.  She had heard a commercial on the radio about it. We had not been dancing since the Caravan closed so she pushed me pretty hard to go. I really didn’t want to, as the last time I had been in a VFW it had been mostly very old folks and not a lot of fun for a young guy.  

And I was right. Almost all were ancient even compared to my 55 years in this life. But that was the sad thing about the night. On the walls all around were pictures of young, and I assume mostly local, men who had fought in WW2. There were pictures of the machines and places of that great time in history. It was dark and I didn’t get to look at everything on the walls there, but I saw nothing of the wars that came after WW2.

I had posted a e-mail I had received earlier speaking of how different the thinking of the American populace was at the beginning of WW2 compared to now.  I ate and danced and talked to many of these old men who teetered and shuffled on the dance floor, often causing me genuine concern for their safety. But mostly I thought about how different our country is now from the country these men knew when young. I wondered if they would have been so anxious to participate in the bloodiest most destructive conflict in the history of man if they had known what the US would look like today after 42 years of Liberal control.

I was told by some of these guys that the VFW is a dying organization. It is said that over 10,000 WW2 vets die each month. A very telling bit of evidence to that statistic was the number of old women “widows” who sat together watching the folks who could still dance.  The VFW stretches the rules a bit these days in a effort to stay active. There was a time when just being a Vet was not enough. You had to have actually fought in a war, or at least have been active in time of war. I don’t know why the VFW never really caught on with Vietnam Vets. I’m not sure about Korean Vet participation.

But I do know that it was nice to be among great men such as those who fought in WW2.  It was good to be among the relics of that tremendous conflict and be reminded of the equally tremendous sacrifice made by these men. It was the last time that both the US government and population were fully dedicated to the goal of freedom, and just law for all in the world.  

Tomorrow is Thanksgiving. All day today I’ve heard all the talking heads speak about how terrible the Indians were treated. I’ve heard the usual garbage about how America is the source of all evil, just turned up in volume a tad, as is usual during a holiday.  Much has been said today about a flood of new movies being released that bash everything American. From Christianity, to the troops and Iraq. And of course the government is as always portrayed as evil and corrupt. 

Anyway I for one am going to start spending a lot more time at the VFW, and tomorrow I’ll eat turkey, and enjoy my family, and give thanks for the bounty this great nation still provides for us all. But this year more than any other I’ll be thinking about the great men of WW2. I’ll be thinking about how regardless of the horror of war, we were at that time, as a nation, greater than perhaps at any other time in our history.  The men I watched at the VFW last Saturday night have little time left in this world. I hope that in the next they get the rewards they so deserve. They in many ways represent the ultimate evolution of the goals of the Pilgrims. Tomorrow I’ll honestly and truly be giving thanks for what I have. But I’ll be hoping that soon the ideals the Americans of WW2 risked all for, and that so many died for, will be restored.

Happy Thanksgiving to you and your families Bo and CT, and to all who visit us.

My Letter to the Editor

Wednesday, October 10th, 2007

The following is my reponse to Charles Kiker of tulia’s letter to the editor in today’s AGN.

 

Dear Sir,

Congress does not condemn, censure, or remove Mr. Limbaugh’s program from armed forces radio because the talking points parroted by left wing smear merchants do not stand up to scrutiny. Of the few times I listen to talk radio I actually hear this exchange between Rush and a Caller and I knew exactly what was discussed. I did not get my talking points from a George Soros funded, Hillary Clinton created, disingenuous attack machine, either.. The transcripts of what took place, where Rush clarified his remarks immediately after the phony soldiers comment, are out there. Rush was speaking of real phony soldiers like Jesse Mackbeth. Plug that name into your search engine.

The facts are clear and a majority of congress was able to discover them easily. Instead of wasting time on partisan hackery it seem congress decided to move on to more important matters. The only ones outraged are those who willfully ignorant and question nothing their handlers tell them.

Bodacious (I removed my real name)

Coulter, Edwards and Codependency – Part Two

Saturday, August 18th, 2007

Back on July 3, I wrote about the “seemingly endless feud between conservative firebrand Ann Coulter and Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards”:

http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/07/03/coulter-edwards-and-codependency/

At that time, Elizabeth Edwards had called into MSNBC’s “Hardball” to lash out directly at Coulter for all the insensitive remarks she made about her husband.  At the time, I opined that this was a quick way for the Edwards campaign to replenish their coffers just before the quarterly contribution numbers were announced.

Now it appears that Edwards is in need of another boost in campaign funds:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/08/edwards-calls-c.html

I’ve been out of the loop for a couple of weeks, having had major surgery on August 6 and only now feeling strong enough to sit up long enough to write this.  Did I miss Ann’s latest jibe at Edwards, or is he just trying to resurrect the old feud that got him so much mileage in the past?  I find it amusing that Edwards calls Coulter a “she-devil,” then tries to reclaim the moral high ground:

“We know these people. We know their game plan. They’re going to attack us personally,” Edwards said. “They attacked Elizabeth personally, because she stood up to that she-devil Ann Coulter. … I should not have name-called. But the truth is — forget the names — people like Ann Coulter, they engage in hateful language.”

Another telling line is the third sentence.  “They’re going to attack us personally”?  Is that a prediction or a wishful thinking on Edwards’ part?  The metamessage is clear:  “Please, Ann, please!  If you don’t attack me again, my campaign is sunk!”  If I were Ann Coulter, I would pass on the bait and remain serenely silent until Edwards finally runs out of bogeymen and ultimately, funds.

This reminds of the old joke:  Q:  What did the sadist do to masochist?  A:  Absolutely NOTHING!

Meeting Mike Huckabee

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

So far in this presidential season, I’ve been silent about who I’m supporting.  But for the last six months, I’ve been leaning toward one candidate.  It all started back in January, when I saw Mike Huckabee on (of all places) the Don Imus Show.  I was impressed enough to post the following comment on the unofficial blog “Mike Huckabee President 2008″ on January 11:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/bluestaterepublican/116849705994000530/

(My apologies to the folks at that blog for taking so long to carry out my promise.  My only excuse is that “soon” can be a very relative word.)

Since January, every time I’ve seen the former Arkansas governor, my admiration has grown.  The man is a solid conservative with some very innovative ideas about issues like health care and education.  I’ve also been impressed by his seemingly unshakeable optimism.  So it was no surprise that when I read in the Amarillo Globe-News that Mike Huckabee would be speaking at the Church at Quail Creek on Sunday, July 23, I made it a point to attend.

For those who don’t know, let me confess that I’m a Christian and a Southern Baptist (in that order).  I was pleased to learn early on that Governor Huckabee is a former Baptist minister, but I’m not so naive as to believe that a person’s religious affiliation necessarily means anything; after all, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore and Bill Clinton are all Baptists (the latter from the same hometown – Hope, Arkansas – as Mike Huckabee).

The Governor’s appearance was clearly announced as neither a political rally nor an endorsement of his candidacy by the church.  That was fine with me, because I’m already familiar with his politics (most, if not all of which I strongly support).  I was interested in learning more about what kind of a Christian the man is.

I was not disappointed.  The Wall of Separation between Church and State was not breached that morning (Democrats, take heed!).  Former Pastor Huckabee preached eloquently on the Parable of the Pharisee and the Tax Collector (Luke 18:9-14).  The theme of his sermon was “The Sin of Doing Good.”  It may sound like an oxymoron, until you realize that his message was about humility.  True to what Jesus taught, he preached that “everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.”  The sermon was seasoned with a number of self-deprecating anecdotes that illustrated that Mike Huckabee is a man who practices what he preaches.  No Pharisee he!

I entered the church a supporter of Mike Huckabee the presidential candidate.  I left admiring Mike Huckabee the man.  Make no mistake about it, this guy is the real deal!  I spoke with him briefly after the service and told him I’ll be praying that the Lord will continue to do a mighty work through him.  And unlike the promise I made six months ago, this is a promise I fully intend to keep.

You might ask, “What chance does this ’second-tier’ candidate have against the likes of cash cows like Giuliani, Romney, or even Fred Thompson (if he chooses to run)?”  All I can say is this: watch the Ames straw poll in Iowa on August 11.  I’m not going to make any predictions, but from what I’ve read, the most popular candidate among social conservatives in Iowa is “None of the Above.”

I was heartened to hear on the news this morning that after his appearance here in Amarillo, Mike Huckabee was headed for … you guessed it: Iowa.  It’ll be an uphill battle, but the more people who meet this man, the more will agree that America needs Mike Huckabee.

Congress in Deep Hole – Keeps Digging

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

Last November, as it became clear that the Democrats would win the majority of the 110th Congress, there was celebration among the faithful.  In the midst of the euphoria, there were even taunts of “How does it feel when it all crumbles down around you?”  Here was my response back then:

http://www.ivorydome.us/2006/11/11/elections-and-alarmism/

Now, just eight short months later, we learn that as of July 12 – 14, a mere 14 percent of those polled think that Congress is doing a good or excellent job.  Amazingly, President Bush actually climbed 4 percent in the same category:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070718/us_nm/usa_politics_poll_dc_2

I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the popularity of Congress sinks even further after the anti-war slumber party last night.

Who would have thought before the election that the Democrats could muck things up so badly?  Not to brag, but back last October, I made the following observations and prediction:

 The sad fact of the matter is, Democrats always have to rely on the corruption of Republicans in order to gain power (remember Watergate and “Read my lips”?). Their campaign slogan seems to be, “Vote for us. We’re not Republicans.” If they actually ran a positive campaign, based solely on their platform (higher taxes, partial birth abortion, gay marriage, open borders, socialized medicine, soft on national security), they’d never get elected.

The other sad fact of the matter is, the Democrats might very well win both houses of Congress in November. Be careful what you wish for, Clint. Along with power goes blame when it all blows up in your faces.

Comment by Curious Texan — October 10, 2006 @ 4:28 pm

And the response from the Left?

Blow it out your butt, old man.

Comment by Clint — October 12, 2006 @ 12:24 pm

On Michael Moore’s Sicko

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007

One of my favorite websites is moorewatch.com and is on my links to the side.  This is the best place on the web to get the facts that Michael Moore leaves out of his docutainment.  As a result of Sicko coming out I have read and learned a great deal about the healthcare industry in America and elsewhere.

I have seen Sicko and reviewed several parts of it to verify some of the claims made on moorwatch.com.  Like all Michael Moore films there are a lot of half-truths, mis-represented facts, and probably a few outright lies. 

To illustrate these points I’ll break down a couple scenes in the film that Moore clearly exploits and misleads his viewers with.

The first one is on the subject of moorewatch.com itself.  In this link, JimK breaks down the entire controversy concerning one of the final scene in sicko where Moore reveals he provided JimK and his family with $12,000 to pay for health insurance premiums.  The film splices together different, un-related posts on the webiste to mislead viewers into thinking Moore saved the website from closing down.  As illustrated in the link, that is not the case.

In another misleading part of the film, Moore makes the viewer believe that a health insurance company, Kaiser, was responsible for an 18 month old girl’s death because the hospital in which the ambulance took her was an “out of network” hospital and the insurance company would not allow testing to be done on the child.  What Moore neglects to tell the viewer is that by federal law all Hospitals are required to treat all patients that are in need of emergency medical care.  The doctor treating the child broke the law and a court found that this was the case.  There is more to that story that can be read here.  Also, this is the same hospital that recently let a person die on their emergency room floor.  This is a government run hospital(Moore doesn’t tell you that, either).

Those are just two examples.  There are many more at moorewatch.com. 

The purpose of Moore’s movie is twofold: to illustrate that there is a problem with healthcare in America and to shock the viewer with heart breaking stories that America would be better off with socialized medicine.

I agree there is a problem with healthcare in America but I don’t think socialism is the answer.  The government seems to cause more problems than it solves when it gets involved situations that involve a few thousand people, let alone 300 million.  Look at hurricane Katrina, Walter reed, congress, and the hospital I mentioned above.  Is that who we want to be responsible for our well being?  Not me, I want to be responsible for myself, the government is not my mom.  Liberals do not know what is best for me.

Perhaps the greatest disservice that Moore does that he delegitimizes his message by misrepresenting facts. As important an issue as healthcare is why should we seek answers to a problem from someone who deceives people into their point of view? We don’t need Michael Moore to sugar coat a turd. If Universal Healthcare has to be misrepresented to make it appealing to the general public then I don’t think it has a place in America’s society.

It is good that Moore is raising the issue to the public at large, but because he distorts everything I think people will see Moore as a snake oil salesman and Moore will do further damage to reforming healthcare than he will do to help it.

Lastly, check out Moorewatch.com often.  They have a great breakdown on a lot of falsehoods in Sick as well as staying up to date on happenings in the main stream media with Moore spreading more mis-represented facts on CNN and other places.