It’s no secret to anyone who frequents this blog that I’m supporting Mike Huckabee for President. It’s also no secret to anyone who listens to talk radio that there are virtually no conservative talk show hosts who do. On the contrary, many of them are openly trying to derail his candidacy. I stopped listening to Mark Levin on my evening commute for that very reason. Every time I turned on his show, it seemed like a non-stop barrage about bad Mike Huckabee and John McCain are for the Republican Party. From what I’ve heard, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are hardly any better, although I haven’t been listening to them much lately either.
Are these relentless attacks on Huckabee having the desired effect? Not for at least one other erstwhile listener. I discovered this comment posted on a Reuters article about Huckabee gaining on Giuliani in the California race (posted by d_sh9456 on December 20, 2007, 7:32 PM):
“For the first time I have moved away from the conservative ‘Dark Side’ and now support Mike Huckabee for President. Just too many power hungry conservative Talk Show Hosts supporting the Wall Street Power Brokers and their candidates. Mike Huckabee has single handedly moved the election system into the light for all true conservatives and Americans by removing the ‘For Sale’ sign from Washington DC.”
I’m old enough to remember 20 years ago when Rush Limbaugh first went national. The immediate appeal of his show was not that he was telling people how to think, but rather that he was articulating the same perspective that so many of us already held but had never heard anyone voice before in the national media. We listened to him because he was one of us. The media elites eventually realized they could make a bundle of money by replicating his formula, and scores of Rush Limbaugh wannabes hit the airwaves.
Now fast forward to 2008. Along comes a presidential candidate who isn’t driven by focus groups or forced into the cookie-cutter Madison Avenue mold of what a presidential candidate should be like. The elites aren’t supporting him because he refuses to kowtow to them. He offers a tax proposal that would reward productivity but rob them of their precious tax shelters. His faith is not just a prop to gain the evangelical vote; he really believes. He cares more for the people on Main Street than the people on Wall Street. In short, Mike Huckabee speaks to so many of us because, like Rush two decades earlier, he’s saying what we believe at a time when everyone else is telling us that what we believe doesn’t matter.
I suspect that many, if not most, of the conservative talk show hosts will continue to attack Mike Huckabee until he either drops out of the race or surprises them all and wins the nomination. But the unintended consequence may be this: How many of us will still be listening?

So far in this presidential season, I’ve been silent about who I’m supporting. But for the last six months, I’ve been leaning toward one candidate. It all started back in January, when I saw Mike Huckabee on (of all places) the Don Imus Show. I was impressed enough to post the following comment on the unofficial blog “Mike Huckabee President 2008″ on January 11: