Archive for the ‘Local’ Category

USA Consistently Dominates Olympics

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

A local blogger posted a cartoon from a newspaper that effectively calls American’s fat lazy slobs.  The comparison was made by showing a Canadian Curler and an American hyper-obese couch potato eating cheese curls.  The blogger was probably projecting, but I have been following the medal count and the USA is dominating with the total number of medals.

This also got me thinking, how many medals have been won by the USA across all of the Olympic games?  The results my come as shock to America haters, but the USA consistently dominates the Olympic games, by a relatively wide margin, too.

Here is an interactive table of the various medal counts.

Read it ad weep, liberals.  America produces the best athletes the world has ever known.

Why I Don’t Post Anything

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Originally this blog was started to defend America’s efforts in Iraq and our leaders who started everything over there.  Despite what exteme leftists might say, things are going great in Iraq and every day grows closer and closer to a time when a large force of troops isn’t needed there.  The war is drawing to a close.

Also, Democrat leaders conceded a great deal of talking points in the whole “Bush lied” meme.  The Rockefeller report outlines all of the “Bush lied to get us into war” statements and concludes what everyone already knew: That the intelligence at the time reflected what Bush was telling congress and the American people.

This blog isn’t a news resource for Amarillo or any kind of revenue generating entity.  Since 2004 nothing has happened in Amarillo than anyone outside of it cares about and sitting around here waiting for stuff to happen is boring.  In other words, I have better stuff to worry about than coving a potential news event.

This blog has primarily been about my opinion, cataloging it, and sharing it.  I refence this place as my knowledge base to rebut liberal buffoons constantly.

The only thing left to post about is the upcoming election and other stuff that happens that I care about.  Right now all I care about is shooting, hunting, and earning enough money to be able to thoughroughly enjoy my time off of work.   As such, I post very little.  Politics concerns me little, especially after the Heller decision, and with Palin as McCain’s pick for VP, I doubt BO is going to get very far, especially after the unscripted debates when Johnny tears BO’s stuttering self a new asshole.

I will be there to gloat on November 5th to gloat or, to blog anew making sure every Democrat hears constantly about Biden’s 5 deferrments and talking extensively about any slip up BO makes to make him look stupid, doing to them what they have done to us.  Yes, very shallow I agree, but I am not above it.  As I have said elsewhere, someone must be willing to play in the mud with the filth if good is to triumpth.

My Letter to the Editor

Wednesday, October 10th, 2007

The following is my reponse to Charles Kiker of tulia’s letter to the editor in today’s AGN.

 

Dear Sir,

Congress does not condemn, censure, or remove Mr. Limbaugh’s program from armed forces radio because the talking points parroted by left wing smear merchants do not stand up to scrutiny. Of the few times I listen to talk radio I actually hear this exchange between Rush and a Caller and I knew exactly what was discussed. I did not get my talking points from a George Soros funded, Hillary Clinton created, disingenuous attack machine, either.. The transcripts of what took place, where Rush clarified his remarks immediately after the phony soldiers comment, are out there. Rush was speaking of real phony soldiers like Jesse Mackbeth. Plug that name into your search engine.

The facts are clear and a majority of congress was able to discover them easily. Instead of wasting time on partisan hackery it seem congress decided to move on to more important matters. The only ones outraged are those who willfully ignorant and question nothing their handlers tell them.

Bodacious (I removed my real name)

"Par for the course" for liberals?

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

On a day when an attack intended to kill Dick Cheney fails and several liberals are disappointed that the attack failed another liberal poster out there made a comment on the PTS site saying he hopes my baby dies.

Criticism is nothing new to me, of which this commenter has a lot to dish out on numerous topics.  As can be expected I have a few criticisms of my own as well.  That’s all fine and good.  I ignore his criticism because he has no reading comprehension.  I am sure he, a long with other people who ignore my criticisms are of a similar opinion of me.

What I don’t do is play games with people’s families.  As you may have read earlier my wife, pregnant at the time, died this past October.  This human refuse has the gall to use that as an attack against me.  It made me sick when I read it.

I am aware this mental deficient may not have known of my wife’s pregnancy or even of her death.  He knows now and all I ask for is an apology.

To strike at the larger issue, what is it with liberals and death fantasies of people they disagree with?  Even then what is the reasoning behind saying you wish someone’s baby were dead when it really happened?  My child died and this trash hopes for it.

How does it feel clint, to know your hopes are fulfilled?

Smoking Taxes

Thursday, December 28th, 2006

Dave Heny belly aches today about smokers having to pay taxes.  As most people tend to do no solution to this “unfair” taxation problem is offered with the only hint to a solution is simply:

 “Texas, as do many states, cities and communities, continues to restrict and prohibit places where people can smoke, but at the same time doesn’t hesitate to slap hefty tariffs on smokers in order to pay the bills. In a strange way, Texas depends heavily on tobacco taxes, but yet publicly proclaims it doesn’t want people to smoke.”

As you  may recall Amarillo put a smoking ban on the ballot in 2005, I think it was.  The ban failed and rightly so.  I don’t think restricting property owner’s rights is the right thing to do.  If people want to boycott an entire restaurant where a small smoking section is that is their choice.  Business owners should not be forced to conform to government’s demands when patrons have a choice when deciding on their nightly entertainment.  Enough opining on that.

Now then, I might be biased when it comes to this issue because I don’t smoke and will never have to pay these taxes.  However, I will agree that paying an increasing amount of taxes is not a favorable predicament for some people.  Given that people choose to smoke, though, I am less inclined to care if smokers have to pay more taxes than I do.

Dave makes the point that Texas depends on tobacco taxes a great deal and that because of this dependence and when people quit purchasing cigarettes tax revenues will go down.  As far as this point goes I think that is a good thing.  Thanks to Texas’ balanced budget laws decreased revenues will mean decreases in government spending.  I guess the only reservation I have about this is what programs the legislature might have to cut.  We’ll have to wait until this happens to debate about that because I have no idea what could be on the table should this arise.

So if taxes are bad and forcing people only to smoke in their own homes (potentially, that actually happened in on California town) is bad what is the solution?  I am fine with taxes because I don’t smoke.  I am not fine with forcing business owners to capitulate because that’s unconscionable.  I say the best option is put it to a vote and see what the people want.  If the majority wants to tell business owners what to do that’s them, but I won’t live there.

Cherry Picking

Wednesday, October 25th, 2006

One of our commenters has this to say about Curious Texan: “Oh and I’’m waaaay smarter than you, so there.”

Really? If that is the case why do you have to resort to this kind of blather?  These are all comments from this site and many more of this type of behavior exists on other sites this commenter frequents.

Learn to read, dumbass.

See ya in hell.

You guys are so dumb!

See you guys after Rush finishes spoon-feeding talking points to ya. (This comment came after he copy and pasted a liberal talking point verbatim)

Jeez man! Learn to read

Cool I won,since you led off with a lying generalization!

Blow it out your butt, old man.

Seriously, go to hell.

I openly admit that I have name called here and elsewhere, maybe not to this degree, and so have other Authors here at Ivory Dome, but, I know for sure I don’t, and can’t speak for Celtic or Curious, that none of us claim to be waaaay smarter than anyone else(For the record however, Curious Texan has completed two masters degrees.  I am sure someone could argue whether that takes smarts to complete or not but I say it does).

I am no psychologist by any stretch of the imagination but I think, based on his atitudes and comments here and elsewhere, our commenter suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder and delusions of grandeur.  Read his comments and come to your own conclusions.

What I Have Been Up To

Friday, October 13th, 2006

First, my wife is pregnant, she is about 6 weeks a long and is doing great.  She has to take special medication so I am busy putting stuff up for sale on ebay to pay for it.

Next, I completed this a while ago, and I even bought one myself.  The Ivorydome t-shirts are for sale here.  The black one is $22.45 + shipping and handling.  I now that is expensive, so I made a white one, it is only $16.45 + shipping.  The shipping isn’t much and it gets to you pretty quick.  These shirts will be good for the next time the local liberals want to have a party commemorating the death of our armed forces.

 A couple of weekends ago I volunteered to help operate the computer system for data entry for the Susan G Komen foundation’s Race for the Cure.  My employer volunteered last year and the system they designed for themselves to enter data was garbage.  This year I wrote a web interface and MySQL database backend to manage the data.  Things went 1000% smoother than last year and of course the race was a huge success.  There were over 3700 registered participants, more than 1000 more from the previous year.

Last, consider this an open thread for the weekend.  Feel free to discuss the upcoming election or whatever else.  Happy Friday the 13th!

Update:  I decided to put some more politics into this post.

Concerning the upcoming election:  I am not worried about it.  If the democrats win the majority that’s fine with me.  They will be the ones on the pedestal and all of their promises will have to be put into action instead of being talked about.  Democrats think they can do better than republicans, well if they get the majority they will be put to the test.  I can’t wait to see what happens.

Also, something I read over at Right Wing News got me thinking, if, and possibly when, Republicans lose control of congress, who are they going to blame? Personally I would blame republicans for losing control.  The GOP won’t be like democrats and blame non-existent voter fraud and label people who didn’t vote for them imbeciles.  The GOP won’t pass the buck like the Democrats have.  I think they will own up to their shortcomings and, in the event of a loss, will hopefully reform itself come 2008 and 2010.

Lastly, I find it sickening that people being angry at the GOP are giving up on them and voting Democrat.  Those people are quitters.  I find it troublesome that people would vote for the party that embraces Michael Moore’s or Cindy Sheehan’s ideology.  I don’t deny the GOP sorely needs to get back to it’s roots and I think the people’s anger at the GOP is legitimate, but I think they should be working to reform the Republican party instead of abandoning it.

democrats, republicans, liberals, gop, michael moore, cindy sheehan, election, congress

Fair and Balanced

Friday, September 15th, 2006

This letter in today’s Amarillo Globe news made me thank once again that I believe in personal responsibility.

James Fluegel says, among other things, “It is time conservatives who backed Bush on the Iraq misadventure admit we were deceived and wrong.”

His LTE says a lot of other stuff and makes some decent points about getting back to conservatism, which I agree with, but this is the only line I somewhat disagree with.

Fluegel, along with the left and democrats, are scapegoating Bush for their own poor decisions.  The left and their supporters have so much hatred for Bush they forget they signed the resolution to go to war and made a bug fuss about Saddam having WMDs and whatever else.  I am sure you remember those quote passed around in e-mails and in various videos out there. 

If Bush is a liar, all of the other people who repeated what he said are liars, too.  Given that, how many people do you honestly think will admit they are liars?  My bet is none.

Secondly, if Mr. Fuegel wants to think he was deceived and he was wrong to support OIF, that’s fine, but there is a lot more blame to be spread around as opposed to putting it all on Bush’s shoulders.

Bush, amarillo, amarillo globe news, congress, democrats, liberal, conservative, republican

Energy Independence

Wednesday, August 30th, 2006

I read a story last week sometime about some guys over in Ireland claming to have invented a free energy source saying, “Mobile phones will never need recharging, cars will never have to be refueled.”  All of this sounds cool but I am curious how they are breaking the laws of physics.  Just think of how this would change the world if it were to be true.

This also got me thinking of what we could do today to help usher in a new era of energy independence.  First, lets take a step back and ask why we desire energy independence.

If you were to ask me it would be to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and not give colluding nations that support terrorists regimes our hard earned dollars.  Others will probably hold environmental friendliness higher than my beliefs and I am sure there are other reasons for energy independence that I haven’t thought of.

One fundamental flaw in all of this less oil usage thinking is that petroleum products are a universal good.  There is a specific word for it that I saw in a Dilbert cartoon but I have no idea what it is right now.  Anyway, something like 47% of every barrel of oil goes to making gasoline.  There is that other 53% that we would be forced to consume even if we had some fantastic free energy device.  The percentage might go down a little, but all of those plastics, oils, and other synthetics out there are necessities nowadays.  A true environmentalist would be pushing for not only decreased gas usage but also buying glass containers and using paper bags, as sand and trees are renewable.

All of that aside, what can we do now to be energy independent?  I looked up solar panels and personal wind turbines and those technologies just aren’t feasible for my needs.  Sure if all I wanted to do was read books all day and sit in the dark at night I might get by but I work with the Internet a great deal and have multiple computers.  Then there is the cost of implementing these devices.  The most efficient windmill was $2500 and the cheaper ones seemed like toys.  I am sketchy with solar panels as well as the weather here would tear them up in short order.  Then there is storage of energy and hooking it up to the current system.  Who knows what that costs.  Being a college student I just don’t have the thousands of dollars required to implement those devices.  Even then, to meet my needs, I would still have to pay the electric company.

After brushing that aside I thought about what we could do as a local community.  The Texas panhandle is blessed with a vast amount of untapped wind energy.  After browsing general electric’s web-site they provide 3 types of electricity producing windmills, two for land use and one for use at sea level.  The bigger one for land use produces 2.5Mw of electricity.  If we desired to fill the same needs as the proposed nuclear power-plant being discussed it would take 1080 windmills.  Now I am not sure if we really need that many and I don’t know how much the implementation or upkeep of that many windmills would cost but it definitely would calm people’s fears about radiation and water usage.  Also, I don’t think it would take and entire decade to put up as many windmills as we would need, either.

I also recently read about an upcoming initiative from wal-mart to sell compact fluorescent bulbs to all of its customers.  I found another article on Slashdot that talked about the same thing and it said of the light bulbs, “if every one of 110 million American households bought just one [CFL], took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.”

Sounds good to me.

energy independence, amarillo, wind turbine, windmill, lightbulb, wal-mart, walmart, compact fluorescent, oil

Lies?!?!

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

Recently the question was asked, “Why does the Globe-Republican (Amarillo Globe News) allow letter writers to blatantly lie?“  I would like to ask the newspaper the same question in regards to Jayne Farris’ recently published letter.

Ms. Farris makes many outlandish claims that can be construed as lies, willful ignorance, brain washing, or just plain mental deficiency.  Of these claims one of the most outlandish is this: “Democrats believe there should be fair and equitable taxation. Republicans believe that only the dwindling middle class should be taxed and the rich should be exempt.”

I wonder what fair and equitable taxation would be? Would that mean the current regressive tax system we have where the top 50% of wage earners pay approximately 96% of all individual income taxes, or does Ms. Farris want a flat tax for all wage earners?  I am curious where she would set the bar. 4% would be just as fair as 100% just as long as everyone is taxed that way.

Another gross misstatement by Ms Farris is this: “Democrats believe workers should be paid for their production. Republicans believe all workers should remain in bondage and CEOs should have golden parachutes.”

I would like to see where she draws her conclusions.  I have never heard anyone on the right say that people should “remain in bondage” in any form or fashion.  I would also like to know what her problem with “Golden Parachutes” are.  Wouldn’t it be nice to receive a $400 million retirement package?  Golden Parachutes and high executive salaries are what makes junior executives and lower employees productive.  CEO’s high earnings and large benefits packages are what people set their standards and goals by.  I learned this in my economics class this summer.  I am open to hear other opinions on the subject.

Somewhat out of sequence Farris makes the claim, “Democrats believe everyone should have access to health care. Republicans believe only the wealthy should have access to health care.”

This statement comes despite the fact that anyone can walk into an emergency room and receive more than adequate health care, no matter their income.  Everyone has access to healthcare and I am unaware of any legislation or talking points from any politician that says anyone but the rich should have access to healthcare.

Continuing, Farris writes, “Democrats believe there should be an energy policy. Republicans believe that what is good for the Bush family and Dick Cheney is good for the country.”

Now I could be missing something here, but voting to keep ANWR closed is not much of an energy policy, not to mention these lines leave “non sequitur” lingering in my mind.  I bet the mentioning of Bush and Cheney has something to do with Haliburton or “War for oil” rhetoric.  Come to think of it, Bush and Cheney, if the war really is for oil, have done far more to ensure our energy independence than any democrat has.  Maybe she is referring to Ted Kennedy’s Nantucket Sound energy policy.

So really, why does the Amarillo Globe News allow letter writers to blatantly lie?”

amarillo, Bush, Cheney, democrats, globe, healthcare, lies, news, republicans, rich, taxes