Archive for the ‘Energy Independence’ Category

On This Day in History …

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

On April 24, 1964, President Lyndon Baines Johnson declared war on poverty on Tommy Fletcher’s front porch in Inez, Kentucky, beginning a 44-year quagmire.  Because this war is obviously unwinnable, I propose we begin withdrawing 60 days after the next President is sworn in.

On April 24, 2006, then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced her secret plan to end the gas war.  In a press release, she proclaimed, “Democrats have a commonsense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas prices by cracking down on price gouging, rolling back the billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies, tax breaks and royalty relief given to big oil and gas companies, and increasing production of alternative fuels.”  Because gas prices have gone up $1.18 per gallon since this announcement, I think it’s high time the Democrats implement this plan.

Energy Breakthrough – Part II

Monday, March 10th, 2008

Back last September, I reported on a discovery by inventor John Kanzius that could revolutionize the field of energy independence. This discovery involved the “burning” of salt water by exposing it to radio waves.  Here’s a link to the original article:

http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/09/14/energy-breakthrough/

During the ensuing months, I’ve been monitoring this story, but little was being reported (except a fair amount of skepticism).  However, there appears to have been a breakthrough in understanding this potential energy source.

Since last November, Rustum Roy, Ph.D. and a team of researchers from Penn State University have been quietly investigating this phenomenon, trying to determine what causes the unexpected release of energy.

Then finally, last Friday (March 7, 2008), Dr. Roy published an article entitled “Observations of polarised RF radiation catalysis of dissociation of H2O-NaCl solutions” in Materials Research Innovations, a London-based journal. 

Here’s a link to the abstract:

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/mri/2008/00000012/00000001/art00002;jsessionid=1lks2qo790v1o.victoria

The full text article costs $48.00.  Even if I were to purchase it, I probably wouldn’t understand it.  But I’m sure that the scientific community will be studying the findings and reporting on this soon.  Stay tuned; this may be the breakthrough we’ve all been waiting for.

Mike Huckabee on Foreign Policy

Saturday, September 29th, 2007

On September 28, Mike Huckabee gave a major foreign policy speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, DC.  I’m a big fan of the governor, particularly on domestic issues, but I’ve been a little apprehensive about his foreign policy credentials.  This speech laid those apprehensions to rest.  Thirty-second sound bites in debates can’t do credit to a something as complex as a candidate’s vision for America’s role in the world.  This speech does, and is worth a listen (or a read).

Here’s a link to the audio of the speech (the video is way too dark and not worth watching, IMHO):

http://www.csis.org/media/csis/events/070928_huckabee.m3u

It’s lengthy (about an hour and 13 minutes),  but you can skip over the introductions and preliminaries; the body of the speech starts at about 5 minutes and 30 seconds).

If you’d prefer reading his prepared remarks, they’re available here:

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=Blogs.View&Blog_id=505

Energy Breakthrough?

Friday, September 14th, 2007

Back on June 21, I received an email from my co-blogger, celtictexan, about a new discovery by John Kanzius (see picture above).  According to a news video attached to the email, Mr. Kanzius developed a method for igniting salt water by exposing it to radio frequencies.  According to the report, Mr. Kanzius discovered this method by accident while experimenting with a cancer treatment using radio frequencies.  This reminds me of Fleming’s serendipitous discovery of penicillin over six decades ago.

Always the skeptic (see my posts on global warming), I remembered how the “discovery” of cold fusion by Pons and Fleischman back in 1989 caused quite a stir, only to lead to profound disappointment when no one was able to replicate their findings independently.  But not wanting to discount this recent finding altogether, I signed up for a Yahoo! News Alert for the word “kanzius”; not being a particularly common name, I figured I wouldn’t be inundated with emails.

I was pleasantly surprised this month when reports started coming in that the Kanzius discovery had been replicated at Penn State University by Professor Emeritus Rustum Roy.  According to Roy, the energy released is the result of the specific radio frequency of the Kanzius machine weakening the bonds between sodium and chloride, and hydrogen and oxygen.  Some reports indicated that Professor Roy was trying to obtain federal funding to research this phenomenon in greater depth.

Skeptics are still claiming the whole thing is a hoax, and I have to admit, I’m not totally convinced.  The crucial question is this:  Does the energy expended (i.e. the radio frequencies) exceed that of the energy produced (the burning salt water)?  A recent report claims that the flame’s temperature exceeds 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit:

http://www.watertechonline.com/news.asp?N_ID=68148

Although I’m no physicist or chemist, I would think that’s a promising sign.  Obviously, much more must be investigated, but the implications of something as abundant as saltwater being used as fuel are staggering.  Bear in mind, there is absolutely no carbon released, so even Al Gore would approve!

Maybe this whole thing will come to naught.  But at least the first hurdle of replication has been crossed.  One thing for sure:  I’m not going to cancel my Yahoo! News Alert any time soon!

Here’s a link to the lastest report on this topic:

http://www.wkyc.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=74285

Energy Independence

Wednesday, August 30th, 2006

I read a story last week sometime about some guys over in Ireland claming to have invented a free energy source saying, “Mobile phones will never need recharging, cars will never have to be refueled.”  All of this sounds cool but I am curious how they are breaking the laws of physics.  Just think of how this would change the world if it were to be true.

This also got me thinking of what we could do today to help usher in a new era of energy independence.  First, lets take a step back and ask why we desire energy independence.

If you were to ask me it would be to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and not give colluding nations that support terrorists regimes our hard earned dollars.  Others will probably hold environmental friendliness higher than my beliefs and I am sure there are other reasons for energy independence that I haven’t thought of.

One fundamental flaw in all of this less oil usage thinking is that petroleum products are a universal good.  There is a specific word for it that I saw in a Dilbert cartoon but I have no idea what it is right now.  Anyway, something like 47% of every barrel of oil goes to making gasoline.  There is that other 53% that we would be forced to consume even if we had some fantastic free energy device.  The percentage might go down a little, but all of those plastics, oils, and other synthetics out there are necessities nowadays.  A true environmentalist would be pushing for not only decreased gas usage but also buying glass containers and using paper bags, as sand and trees are renewable.

All of that aside, what can we do now to be energy independent?  I looked up solar panels and personal wind turbines and those technologies just aren’t feasible for my needs.  Sure if all I wanted to do was read books all day and sit in the dark at night I might get by but I work with the Internet a great deal and have multiple computers.  Then there is the cost of implementing these devices.  The most efficient windmill was $2500 and the cheaper ones seemed like toys.  I am sketchy with solar panels as well as the weather here would tear them up in short order.  Then there is storage of energy and hooking it up to the current system.  Who knows what that costs.  Being a college student I just don’t have the thousands of dollars required to implement those devices.  Even then, to meet my needs, I would still have to pay the electric company.

After brushing that aside I thought about what we could do as a local community.  The Texas panhandle is blessed with a vast amount of untapped wind energy.  After browsing general electric’s web-site they provide 3 types of electricity producing windmills, two for land use and one for use at sea level.  The bigger one for land use produces 2.5Mw of electricity.  If we desired to fill the same needs as the proposed nuclear power-plant being discussed it would take 1080 windmills.  Now I am not sure if we really need that many and I don’t know how much the implementation or upkeep of that many windmills would cost but it definitely would calm people’s fears about radiation and water usage.  Also, I don’t think it would take and entire decade to put up as many windmills as we would need, either.

I also recently read about an upcoming initiative from wal-mart to sell compact fluorescent bulbs to all of its customers.  I found another article on Slashdot that talked about the same thing and it said of the light bulbs, “if every one of 110 million American households bought just one [CFL], took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.”

Sounds good to me.

energy independence, amarillo, wind turbine, windmill, lightbulb, wal-mart, walmart, compact fluorescent, oil