<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Letter to the Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
	<description>Conservatism Digitalised</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Curious Texan</title>
		<link>http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Well, the auction is over.  The letter sold for $2,100,100.00.  I wonder if the 41 Democrat senators (either individually or collectively) will take Rush up on his original challenge to show they support the troops and match that amount.

Don&#039;t hold your breath!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the auction is over.  The letter sold for $2,100,100.00.  I wonder if the 41 Democrat senators (either individually or collectively) will take Rush up on his original challenge to show they support the troops and match that amount.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hold your breath!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Texan</title>
		<link>http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>When I was out at lunch today I heard the most amazing thing!  Rush received the original letter sent to the head of Clear Channel and signed by the 41 Democrat senators.  He&#039;s auctioning the letter off on eBay, along with a titanium brief case, made by Haliburton no less!

The letter will be on eBay for one week, and proceeds from the auction will go to the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, a non-profit organization that helps out the families of fallen Marines and Federal law enforcement officers.

Rush has offered a challenge to each of the 41 senators who signed the letter that if they really support the troops to match whatever funds are raised through the auction.

Don&#039;t hold your breath!

Here&#039;s a link to the eBay page:

http://members.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&amp;userid=rush-letter-for-charity

Takers anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was out at lunch today I heard the most amazing thing!  Rush received the original letter sent to the head of Clear Channel and signed by the 41 Democrat senators.  He&#8217;s auctioning the letter off on eBay, along with a titanium brief case, made by Haliburton no less!</p>
<p>The letter will be on eBay for one week, and proceeds from the auction will go to the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, a non-profit organization that helps out the families of fallen Marines and Federal law enforcement officers.</p>
<p>Rush has offered a challenge to each of the 41 senators who signed the letter that if they really support the troops to match whatever funds are raised through the auction.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t hold your breath!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the eBay page:</p>
<p><a href="http://members.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&#038;userid=rush-letter-for-charity" rel="nofollow">http://members.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPage&#038;userid=rush-letter-for-charity</a></p>
<p>Takers anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celtictexan</title>
		<link>http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>celtictexan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>I wonder why lib&#039;s don&#039;t attack this guy?

Jesse Adam Macbeth (b. Jesse Adam &lt;b&gt;Al-Zaid,&lt;/b&gt; [1] in 1984) is a civilian anti-war protester who falsely claimed to be an Army Ranger and veteran of the Iraq War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why lib&#8217;s don&#8217;t attack this guy?</p>
<p>Jesse Adam Macbeth (b. Jesse Adam <b>Al-Zaid,</b> [1] in 1984) is a civilian anti-war protester who falsely claimed to be an Army Ranger and veteran of the Iraq War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Texan</title>
		<link>http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Texan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/10/10/my-letter-to-the-editor/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the same old tired liberal tactic of isolating an out-of-context quote and building a case around it out of whole cloth.  Which reminds me of an exchange I had at PTS last summer:

http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/07/03/coulter-edwards-and-codependency/#comment-20853

There&#039;s nothing like going back to the primary sources in their entirety to debunk their arguments.  But be prepared; when you do, you&#039;re opening yourself up to all sorts of &lt;i&gt;ad hominem&lt;/i&gt; attacks.

I recently saw an example of this kind of cherry picking (this time from the conservative side) that shows that you can essentially make anyone say anything (celtictexan should get a kick out of this):

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/189701.php

Of course the difference is, everyone (liberals included) understands that this is an out-of-context sound bite.  Why they can&#039;t see that in Rush&#039;s case means one of two things:  they&#039;re either woefully ignorant or totally disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same old tired liberal tactic of isolating an out-of-context quote and building a case around it out of whole cloth.  Which reminds me of an exchange I had at PTS last summer:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/07/03/coulter-edwards-and-codependency/#comment-20853" rel="nofollow">http://www.ivorydome.us/2007/07/03/coulter-edwards-and-codependency/#comment-20853</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing like going back to the primary sources in their entirety to debunk their arguments.  But be prepared; when you do, you&#8217;re opening yourself up to all sorts of <i>ad hominem</i> attacks.</p>
<p>I recently saw an example of this kind of cherry picking (this time from the conservative side) that shows that you can essentially make anyone say anything (celtictexan should get a kick out of this):</p>
<p><a href="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/189701.php" rel="nofollow">http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/189701.php</a></p>
<p>Of course the difference is, everyone (liberals included) understands that this is an out-of-context sound bite.  Why they can&#8217;t see that in Rush&#8217;s case means one of two things:  they&#8217;re either woefully ignorant or totally disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

