Archive for November, 2006

Undermining American Civilization

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

By sword or by bent knee, Islam’s goal is to dominate the world. Here we see the acceleration of the fall of America. While Christianity has long been under attack by liberals, they will approach this with widespread arms. Take a long look at the true face of Islam.

If you don’t know the custom of swearing oath (There much disagreement on this) on a bible was started by George Washington when he was elected our first president. Legend has it that he added the words “so help me God” and used either his family bible, or one borrowed from a nearby Masonic lodge.

While it is true that perhaps for the first time, a true test of the separation of government and religion is facing America, it is a test that should never have been allowed to happen. In this case I must agree that he be allowed to take his oath on the Qu’ran as to not do so would truly be a violation of the 1st amendment.

But this man, Keith Ellison, a former member of the Racist group Nation of Islam, should never have been elected. Many years of every conceivable way of tearing down the Judea Christian principals this Nation was built upon has culminated in setting the stage for a dangerous, violent and intellectually backward group of people under the guise of Islam to advance their gutter culture.

The many years of liberal effort to destroy everything Christian, everything derived from Western Culture is about to pay off. We are about to see the  rise of Islam in America.

The Pope and Islam

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

Is it dehellenization, or is it liberalism you decide. The Pope said what needed to be said. I think he just should have changed that one word to bring things into modern context.

Democrats and the Profession of Arms

Sunday, November 26th, 2006

This morning on Fox News Sunday, I heard Korean War veteran and profesional politician Charles Rangel articulate a position that is all too prevalent among Democrats:

“I want to make it abundantly clear: if there’s anyone who believes that these youngsters want to fight, as the Pentagon and some generals have said, you can just forget about it. No young, bright individual wants to fight just because of a bonus and just because of educational benefits. And most all of them come from communities of very, very high unemployment. If a young fella has an option of having a decent career or joining the army to fight in Iraq, you can bet your life that he would not be in Iraq.”

Michelle Malkin has posted the video:

http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/26/video-rangel-says-men-join-the-army-only-if-they-cant-have-a-decent-career/

My son-in-law recently returned from Iraq to Germany, but not having spoken with him at length, it would be presumptuous of me to address his motivations or those of his comrades in arms. But as a former “young, bright individual,” I can tell you that after finishing my bachelor’s degree cum laude, I enlisted as a buck private in 1972 (no enlisted credit for college back then).  My initial motivation was to learn another language (Russian) to complement my German major and French minor.  Twenty years, one more language (Polish) and two masters degrees later, I hung up my uniform for the last time.

In the two decades I served, I never considered my options to be a choice between a “decent career” and service in the army.   Far from merely being a “decent career,” my choice to stay in the military was fulfilling and totally without regrets.  And as far as coming from a community with “very, very high unemployment,” I grew up in an upper-middle class family in upstate New York (my father was a dentist).  As a recent college graduate at the time of my enlistment, I had many options.  If the Heritage Foundation study Chris Wallace cited is to be believed, today’s enlistees have options, too.  Yet they choose to serve, many out of a sense of duty and honor.

Compare the statements of Representative Rangel to the recent decision of the San Francisco city government to ban Junior ROTC from its high schools, ostensibly to keep poor, unsuspecting kids with limited options from being brainwashed into joining the military.  Then revisit Senator Kerry’s “botched joke”:

“You know, education, if you make the most of it, you study hard, you do your homework and you make an effort to be smart, you can do well. If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq.” 

Isn’t this the same decent career/service in the army dichotomy that Rangel poses and the San Francisco decision alludes to? 

Politics and Generosity

Tuesday, November 21st, 2006

This following article illustrates one of the major differences between conservatives and liberals:

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/204/story_20419_1.html

Ever since the New Deal, the liberal philosophy about charity has been that it begins not at home, but in Washington.  As a result, many liberals tend to think that the morally neutral act of “rendering to Caesar” is sufficient to alleviate suffering.  I remember talking to my liberal brother about this.  His response was classic: “I do my share.  I pay my taxes.”

The problem with this attitude is that it depersonalizes the entire process.  One of the benefits of person-to-person charity is that relationships are formed and people are transformed – both the benefactor and the recipient.  Throwing money at the problem does nothing to change lives.

The political payback of governmental charity is that it has been an effective way of buying votes.  The Democrats learned this early on, and in more recent years the Republicans tried doing the same thing.  Unfortunately for the GOP, the conservative base is not that easily bought off.

Another problem with coerced charity is that it has created a whole class of bureaucrats whose job security is predicated on the perpetuation of human suffering.  Give a man a fish, he can eat for a day; teach a man to fish, and you’ve put the existence of the Department of Fish Distribution in jeopardy.

Lest you think I”m being too hard on liberals, I will concede that liberals can be very generous – with other peoples’ taxes.

The Liberal Mind, and Solipsism

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

When I write things I want to say, things that buzz around in the back of my mind I am sometimes stumped by how to express them. Sometimes it’s because I’ve never been in quite the right situation to bring those thoughts together. Tonight I read this, and allot of things clicked. A military veteran who went into teaching after the service wrote this. I did make a few changes to better suit what I’m trying to get across but nothing factual has changed just some cleaning up of some profanity. He no longer is a teacher. This is his story;

I was about 24 years old when I received my teaching certificate. Fresh out of college, my first assignment was the gigantic — how shall I describe it? — gray limestone edifice known as Central High School in inner city Columbus Ohio. We lovingly refer to Central High School as The Rock — and it is kind of like Alcatraz. It’s right on Route 40, which is the old Wilderness Road that goes through Cumberland Gap and on to Colorado and beyond.

Right down the street from us was the old massive brick building of the Ohio State Mental Hospital. Some people get those confused — Central High and the mental hospital. My first year there I, got them confused, believe me. In the third week of December, just before Christmas break, I got a most sobering introduction to public education. For those of you that are non-teachers, right before Christmas break is the most dangerous time of the year because the little dears have now been in school for about four months — an incredibly long amount of time. They haven’t been out on the streets much, and they miss all the “jive” — and so it’s cruel and unusual punishment to keep them in school so long, I suppose.

It was then that I received one of the most vivid and lasting lessons about public education that I have ever experienced. I got a glimpse into the innermost “liberal” recesses of a teacher’s mind. I was raised in a liberal family but, I wasn’t a liberal by that time, but they surrounded me, as a teacher. Let me tell you about the day that I actually saw the depth of their doublethink.

My room was on the second floor, overlooking the teachers’ parking lot. It was an early afternoon in December. The steam heat was stifling on the upper floors — you know how those old buildings are; you can’t turn the things off in the summertime, and in the wintertime they just go full blast. So I had my window slightly open. I was jabbering on about something when I heard a clear “pop-pop” like the sound of a small-caliber pistol being discharged. As I looked out the window for the source of the sound, I distinctly saw a male shooting into the windshield of a car. From my vantage point I saw it clearly. I couldn’t have been more than 20 or 30 feet away. I then saw a man, who I recognized as the Auto Shop teacher, run out to confront the shooter. To my horror, after about 15 seconds or so of conversation (I couldn’t, of course, hear what they were saying), I saw the shooter point the gun at the teacher, aim, hesitate, bring the gun back to his body, eject the shell from this cheap revolver, aim again — take deadly aim — and fire. The teacher let out a cry and I did hear that. The teacher went down. And of course the assailant fled.

I called the hall monitor to take my class and went down to the teacher’s aid. He was sitting up and holding his lower chest when I got to him. What was amazing was that it couldn’t have been more than a minute or so from the time I heard the shot to the time I arrived at his side, but already there was a throng of students surrounding the teacher — with their ghetto blasters going… It seems the sight of blood just makes them go nuts. And that’s exactly what they were doing. He was completely surrounded by these types.

The teacher, whose name was Edwin Peters, was a kind, grandfatherly Industrial Arts teacher in his fifties. He really didn’t have to be a teacher, but he was dedicated to trying to help these inner city kids.

He was having trouble breathing from what those of you, who like me have been in the service, will know as a sucking chest wound. What happens is that the shell enters the diaphragm and you have problems breathing. You have to take care of it right away or the person’s going to suffocate. You have to stuff something in the wound — and that’s what I did. He rested more easily after that and some of his color came back. He was sheet-white when I first came down. But it seemed to me that he was even more embarrassed than he was hurt. He was embarrassed by his surroundings, by this jovial throng; embarrassed by his life’s blood spilling out in the parking lot.

He then started to talk — and this was the most amazing part of the whole incident for me. He spoke not so much to me as just generally, in a general sense. He was in shock, sure enough, but it wasn’t a shock that was totally debilitating. I got the distinct feeling — and even today I feel this way — that he was trying to convince himself of something. It was as if the event that had just happened to him, was something totally outside the realm of his comprehension. And embarrassment and confusion just welled up in him.

He started talking, and of course this is going to be paraphrased but I think it’s pretty true to what he said. He looked around, and he looked at me, and then he said, “Apollo was a good person.” And that kind of threw me. I didn’t know what he was talking about. And he continued talking. “He must’ve needed that money for a Christmas present. I told him to put that gun down. That’s a felony. It would be a felony to shoot someone. And it would ruin his chances for the basketball scholarship”.

Peters is telling me this stuff while he’s sitting there bleeding. “I know his mother. I’ve talked to her. She’s a fine lady. She tries hard. But she’s has 9 other kids… and it’s hard.” You know, that kind of stuff. He babbled on in that vein for some time. And it suddenly dawned on me — the entire story of what went on: who this thug was and what had happened.

I’d known this Apollo. I’d seen him around. He was the previous year’s basketball star. The next year, which is the year I’m talking about, he became a senior but was too old, at 20, to play basketball. So he spent most of his time roaming the halls. You don’t want to get him out of school, you know. You have compulsory education in Ohio until you’re 18, but if you’re nice and don’t cause too many problems — if you don’t gun down the teachers and stuff like that — you can stay ’til you’re 20, 21, 22… even bring the wife and kids to the graduation; that’s all right.

I’d had run-ins with him when I was on hall duty. And Apollo, was no shrimp, believe me. I’m 6′4″ and he stood about 6′7″, 230-240 pounds. A very, very dangerous youth.

Now Apollo mostly hung around the cafeteria. And he knew the schedule. He knew when the cafeteria worker took the day’s receipts to the bank. And that’s what he was waiting for. He was waiting for that chance. When I looked down from my classroom window, he was shooting into the windshield of the car belonging to the cafeteria worker who was taking the money to the bank. He chose that day to strike. Peters had intervened, unarmed, to try to “reason with the boy.” And that’s a direct quote from Peters’ mouth.

Apollo, probably enraged at the disturbance, purposely shot Peters — and there was no mistake about it. It was just animal instinct, like when you take a bone from a dog. Miraculously, when Apollo first aimed at Peters, his cheap 25-caliber revolver misfired. What did Peters do? Did he rush him? Did he run? No. He stood there and “tried to reason with the boy.” Those are his exact words.

Apollo coolly ejected the faulty shell, rechambered a fresh one, and shot Peters with deadly accuracy. And at ten feet, a 25-caliber pistol proved to be deadly. All this came rushing back to me while I was helping Peters remain calm. At first I didn’t understand what Peters was talking about, the ravings of this “liberal” mind. “Don’t blame him,” Peters said. “It’s his background. His mother tried.”

As he lost more blood, the circle of youth’s became louder and they started jumping around, their ghetto blasters were blasting, and they were “doing their thing.” And it became even harder for me to follow what he was saying. “I had him in class. He’s a good worker,” Peters said. He was talking about Apollo. His mind reeled under the inconsistency of his code of beliefs and the actual fact of his predicament. And I believe that his mind was telling him, No, Peters, you’re not lying there on a parking lot, dying from a gunshot wound… you’re just at a pep rally. He just didn’t fully understand.

Never once in the approximately five minutes that I held him up there before the squad came did he ask about himself. And I thought that was a phenomenal situation. The entire time, Peters tried to convince me — or convince himself, or convince somebody — that Apollo didn’t do what I saw him do with my own eyes: shoot him. His last words were — and I do remember these quite vividly — “Where did we go wrong? It’s not his fault.” And then he said “His fault — his fault….” Just like that. And I kept thinking that at the last second, Peters finally realized the enormity of the crime that had been committed against him.To this day, I don’t know, but I have that feeling.

He lost consciousness for the last time as the squad came, and he died on the way to the hospital. The bullet had hit the bottom of his heart. Now Peters really was a typical teacher. Middle class, hard working, established. Just a nice guy. You know what I’m talking about? Just a nice individual.

And like all nice folk’s everywhere, especially teachers, he was a chronic sufferer from a disease we have in our race known as solipsism. In philosophy, one form of solipsism, the one I’m talking about, is the belief that “the world is just like me.” The belief that, “All can be reasoned with; everyone’s relatively nice.” And this “mirror image” fantasy so clouds the mind of “nice” folk’s that they’ll go to their needless deaths — and, believe me, there are going to be a lot of them going to their needless deaths — clinging to phrases like “Come reason with me and we’ll work things out…. Just give the poor better housing and education and they’ll be like Wally and the Beaver, or David and Ricky just playing the guitars in the family room… and Dorothy and the Lost Children are still in Never-Never Land.”

It’s this “niceness,” this kind of solipsism that says everyone is just like us, that’s drilled into Americans from the first day of kindergarten to the day they graduate from public school. “Be nice. Don’t rock the boat. Get a job. And everything will be all right. It’s the 50’s again. Everything is fine.” But they never stop to think that about 90 to 95 per cent of the world isn’t the America of the 50’s. It isn’t “liberal”. It isn’t middle class. It certainly isn’t nice. And it doesn’t suffer from solipsism. Much of the non-western world is just like that gang of youths excited by the site of a good man’s blood. Much of the non-western world wants to see America’s blood.

Another War Hero Dissed

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

I am shocked, SHOCKED I say, to see that the good reputation of another Vietnam War hero has been besmirched, this time by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW):

http://blog.citizensforethics.org/taxonomy/term/88

John Murtha earned two Purple Hearts, the Vietnamese Cross for Galantry, and the Bronze Star with Valor device.

That’s dispicable.  The man’s a decorated United States Marine Corps veteran. Something those lying left-wing scumbags will never be able to change.

(/sarcasm off)

 

Veterans Day

Sunday, November 12th, 2006

 I wouldn’t normally post things that go around the E-mail circuit, but in light of the remarks made by Kerry, and the victory of those who support him I thought this worthwhile. The guy in the wheelchair really says it all.
 
It  is the VETERAN   ,  not the preacher,
who has given us freedom of religion.
It  is the

It  is the VETERAN  ,  not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press.

 

It  is the veteran ,
who serves under the Flag,

 
ETERNAL  REST GRANT THEM, O LORD, AND LET PERPETUAL LIGHT SHINE UPON

THEM  God  Bless them all!!! 

Happy Veteran’s Day to all who have served our country!!
 

Elections and Alarmism

Saturday, November 11th, 2006

A few days before the election, one of our friends at PTS posed this question:

How does it feel when it all crumbles down around you?

I promised that I would answer his question after I had sorted it all out.  Now that a decent interval has passed, I’m ready to take a stab at it.

First, I want to challenge the premise of the question.  I honestly don’t know how it feels when all crumbles down around me.  I got up on Wednesday morning, put on my pants one leg at a time, and went to work just like I do every Wednesday morning.  I was disappointed, but not devastated.  Like the proverbial frog in the pot of boiling water, the heat of disappointment has gradually increased as the Republican Congress has strayed further and further away from the principles that brought it to power 12 years ago: smaller government, tighter spending, less corruption and pork.  That disappointment has been heightened from time to time over the last six years by a Republican president who has similarly turned his back on the GOP’s conservative principles.  But it’s not something that hit me all at once.

Then early Thursday morning, something else struck me.  The question also presupposes that the Republican defeat is something so cataclysmic that conservatives can never recover from it.  This apocalyptic scenario is reminiscent of the global warming rhetoric of this century and, for that matter, the global cooling rhetoric of three decades ago (Has anyone else noticed that the environmentalists have been subtly changing the term of art lately to “climate change,” perhaps in an effort to hedge their bets?).  I may not be old enough to remember the last six Ice Ages and the subsequent global warming that brought this planet out, but I can distinctly remember at least two conservative “Ice Ages”:  the 1964 defeat of Barry Goldwater and the 1976 loss of Ronald Reagan to Gerald Ford for the presidential nomination.  For that matter, the Democrats controlled the House of Representatives for more than 70 percent of my 56 years on this earth.  Politics, like climate, is cyclical.

Another reason I’m not despairing is that conservatism wasn’t defeated, Republicanism (or rather what it’s become) was.  Rahm Emmanuel should be given credit for recruiting as many moderate to conservative Democrats to run for Congress as he did.  But the heavy lifting is going to come next year when these blue-dog Democrats run head long into the agenda of the liberal Democrat leadership.  Someone is going to be disappointed: either the Netroots, who want nothing less than an immediate pullout from Iraq and George W. Bush’s head on the chopping block of impeachment; or the Republicans and Independents who voted for Democrat candidates who, in many cases, ran to the right of their Republican opponents.

Finally, my disappointment has been tempered by the fact that my hope is built on something much less transient than which political party happens to be in control of Congress at any given time.  Chuck Colson once said that the Second Coming of the Messiah isn’t going to be on Air Force One.  Neither is Congress going to be the source of anyone’s salvation.  For those who place too much hope in politics, all can crumble down around them when the final vote is tallied. If you don’t believe me, revisit some of the posts at PTS (or any other left-wing blog) immediately following the 2004 election. 

To put it all in perspective, let me close with the final verses of the poem “Choose Something Like a Star” by Robert Frost:

So when at times the mob is swayed

To carry praise or blame too far,

We may choose something like a star

To stay our minds on and be staid.
 

As the holiday season approaches and you still find yourself in either euphoria or despair because of the election results, stay your mind on that Star in the East that the Magi followed.  Wise men still seek Him.

Troops respond to Kerry

Saturday, November 4th, 2006

The worst political blunder in History?

Saturday, November 4th, 2006

John Kerry is stupid. He is a liar and a traitor. But even I was shocked by his recent statement about the troops. It was a blunder of stupendous proportions and will sink him, politically, forever outside the liberal haven of Mass. Read more here. Pay particular attention to the Glen Beck film.