Archive for August, 2006

National Guardsman Attacked, Called "Babykiller"

Thursday, August 31st, 2006

I found this at Michelle Malkin’s website today.  The post talks about a national guardsman in Parkland, Washington who was attacked by four people, called the soldier a “baby killer,” and was left for dead.

The article doesn’t expressly say the attackers were anit-war activists, but how much convincing do you need?

This isn’t an isolated incident either.  Michelle’s post links to other anti-military incidents as well, including an activist sentenced to 5 years in prison for attacking an army recruiting station, soldier beatings in Seattle.  Not included in her links are other incidents in California where the ROTC HQ was vandalized on a college campus and a recovering soldier at Walter Reed Medical Center was sent a card that told him to die. (I am too busy to look up the links, but if you want them just ask)

I will admit the anti-troop, anti-military wing of the democratic party is only a small minority, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that movement is gaining strength.   Is the left going to speak out against these crimes?

activist, anti-war, babykiller, hate, liberals, military, national guard, washington, activist

Energy Independence

Wednesday, August 30th, 2006

I read a story last week sometime about some guys over in Ireland claming to have invented a free energy source saying, “Mobile phones will never need recharging, cars will never have to be refueled.”  All of this sounds cool but I am curious how they are breaking the laws of physics.  Just think of how this would change the world if it were to be true.

This also got me thinking of what we could do today to help usher in a new era of energy independence.  First, lets take a step back and ask why we desire energy independence.

If you were to ask me it would be to decrease our dependence on foreign oil and not give colluding nations that support terrorists regimes our hard earned dollars.  Others will probably hold environmental friendliness higher than my beliefs and I am sure there are other reasons for energy independence that I haven’t thought of.

One fundamental flaw in all of this less oil usage thinking is that petroleum products are a universal good.  There is a specific word for it that I saw in a Dilbert cartoon but I have no idea what it is right now.  Anyway, something like 47% of every barrel of oil goes to making gasoline.  There is that other 53% that we would be forced to consume even if we had some fantastic free energy device.  The percentage might go down a little, but all of those plastics, oils, and other synthetics out there are necessities nowadays.  A true environmentalist would be pushing for not only decreased gas usage but also buying glass containers and using paper bags, as sand and trees are renewable.

All of that aside, what can we do now to be energy independent?  I looked up solar panels and personal wind turbines and those technologies just aren’t feasible for my needs.  Sure if all I wanted to do was read books all day and sit in the dark at night I might get by but I work with the Internet a great deal and have multiple computers.  Then there is the cost of implementing these devices.  The most efficient windmill was $2500 and the cheaper ones seemed like toys.  I am sketchy with solar panels as well as the weather here would tear them up in short order.  Then there is storage of energy and hooking it up to the current system.  Who knows what that costs.  Being a college student I just don’t have the thousands of dollars required to implement those devices.  Even then, to meet my needs, I would still have to pay the electric company.

After brushing that aside I thought about what we could do as a local community.  The Texas panhandle is blessed with a vast amount of untapped wind energy.  After browsing general electric’s web-site they provide 3 types of electricity producing windmills, two for land use and one for use at sea level.  The bigger one for land use produces 2.5Mw of electricity.  If we desired to fill the same needs as the proposed nuclear power-plant being discussed it would take 1080 windmills.  Now I am not sure if we really need that many and I don’t know how much the implementation or upkeep of that many windmills would cost but it definitely would calm people’s fears about radiation and water usage.  Also, I don’t think it would take and entire decade to put up as many windmills as we would need, either.

I also recently read about an upcoming initiative from wal-mart to sell compact fluorescent bulbs to all of its customers.  I found another article on Slashdot that talked about the same thing and it said of the light bulbs, “if every one of 110 million American households bought just one [CFL], took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.”

Sounds good to me.

energy independence, amarillo, wind turbine, windmill, lightbulb, wal-mart, walmart, compact fluorescent, oil

In Memorium: The Frog Walk Fantasy, Part II

Tuesday, August 29th, 2006

There are times like these that I wish I was proficient in Photo Shop, so I could cut and paste this face:

 060829_fw_armitagetn.jpg

into this picture:

rove6-arrest.jpg

 Now that the truth appears to be coming out about who the real “leaker” was, the media frenzy of the last year is starting to more resemble the John Mark Karr non-story than Watergate. 

But Plamegate is nontheless fascinating, because it reveals the ugly underbelly of the political culture of Washington.  Here are some of the main characters in this travesty:

The Wilsons, that arrogant, egotistical, vindictive couple that believed that nepotism was a perfectly legitimate means of rehabilitating the CIA’s sullied reputation at the expense of the Administration.

Robert Novak, a crusty old conservative columnist who stumbled into a maelstrom through the bumbling of Richard Armitage, a moderate State Department type who probably never had an axe to grind (unlike most of the other principals).

Colin Powell, one of the Left’s favorite Republicans, who left the Bush Adminstration swinging in the breeze for a couple of years, while he knew who the culprit was since at least October 2003, deeming that covering the State Department’s butt was more important than getting to the truth and avoiding the expense and distraction of the Fitzgerald investigation.

The Mainstream Media, who jumped at any chance to make the Bush Administration look bad, resembling the National Inquirer, but without that tabloid’s integrity.

The Left-wing blogosphere, who wants so badly to bring down Bushchimpsterhitler that they believed that if they said it loud enough, closed their eyes and visualized it, it would happen.

Now it turns out that not only was “Plamegate” not instigated by a vindictive White House, the whole Niger-Iraq yellow cake connection may have actually been true (despite “Mr. Plame’s” insistence to the contrary).  My favorite socialist, Christopher Hitchens, wrote a compelling article last month making that case:

http://www.slate.com/id/2146475/

His latest piece on Plamegate is equally as insightful:

http://www.slate.com/id/2148555

As the mid-term elections approach, one can only hope that more of the Republican “culture of corruption” portrayed by the Democrats will blow up in their faces.

Anyone hear anything lately about how the case against Tom DeLay is proceeding?

Learn From Our Government’s Mistakes

Tuesday, August 29th, 2006

Today (yesterday at 11:30 pm actually) is the anniversary of the beginning of one of the greatest governmental failures of the entire United State’s history.

Wikipedia has a great write up on Katrina.

The greatest thing I think we learned from that disaster was the grand ineptitude of government.   Many arguments can be made where the failures are rooted and the partisans will bicker endlessly.  One thing is for certain, though, and that is government cannot be trusted, especially when it comes to disaster relief.

I feel sorriest for the souls reaching for handouts in the days after the disaster.  They are the ones who actively depended on the government and the government left a lot of them to die.

Don’t get me wrong, though.  I would be quite thankful if the government helped me get on my feet after a huge disaster.  The difference is, I am not going to “ride out the storm” and then expect the government to swoop down and rescue me.

While I am thinking of it, one of the most outlandish claims from the left came from Randall Robinson at the Huffington post saying that people were eating corpses to survive only 4 days after the worst of the storm had passed.  Robinson has since retracted his claim but I recall reading the original post and the comment when unnoticed by the editors for quite some time.  Talk about fear mongering.

Katrina, Louisiana, New Orleans, Mississippi, government, nagin, blanco, bush

Fascism? Fear mongering?

Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006

I caught an article today that contained words from a man named John  Orman, who is a political science professor at Fairfield University, requesting that Joe Lieberman should be kept off the ballot in Connecticut’s coming election.  I understand there might be some hard feelings among some voters over there, but isn’t it Lieberman’s constitutional right to run for Senator, or any other office for that matter?

I have heard similar claims on other democrat message boards and what not, but this is one of the most prominent persons I have seen who is advocating violating the constitution.  Actions like professor Orman’s are why I believe democrats are talking out of their back sides when it comes to civil liberties.

Back when Lamont won the Democrat primary Cheney had some harsh words to share about supporting the Al-Qaeda candidate, or something along those lines.  Democrats and leftists called Cheney out for fear mongering.  I don’t blame the dems for saying as such because that sounds a lot like fear mongering to me.  However, who do the democrats think they are complaining about fear mongering?  You would think that if liberals are complaining so much about fear mongering wouldn’t they want to do it from a non hypocritical standpoint?

Liberals are screaming loudest over the alleged loss of civil liberties (and the Iraqi Freedom arm of the GWoT, but that is a different post), all of this spearheaded by the ACLU.  What is the official ACLU position on the right to keep and bear arms?  They believe arms of any type should only be use by militias.  Read for yourself here.  Liberals are picking and choosing their battles about constitutional rights and using a fear mongering tactic to discredit Bush and win opposition votes.  Lamont’s entire anti-war campaign is based on fear mongering about Bush’s handling about Iraq.

Think about some of the stuff you read in the news and on liberal websites.  Recall the cries of “this country is going downhill,” “bush is destroying America,” “Bush is a fascist,” “jackbooted government thugs are gonna get us,” etc.  All of this stuff is fear mongering.  Don’t let the left fool you with their dishonest talking points.

Continuing with the civil liberties discussion, I will admit the Bush’s actions may very well be in violation of the constitution, however, liberals are ignoring other parts of the constitution such as the amendments that give citizen’s the right to a fair trial and presumes their innocence.  Combine this with the liberal disdain for the 2nd amendment and the denying of the right to life to countless children, and the left is no worse than the right is when it comes to constitutional violations.

libearsl, democrats, republicans, conservative, bush, cheney, liberman, lamont, fear mongering, civil liberties, civil rights, 2nd ammendments, right to privacy, constitution, connecticut

Open Thread

Friday, August 18th, 2006

Here are some topics for conversaiton.

The Jonebenet case in the news 10 years later.

ACLU Once again subverts national security.

US blocked Iran from shipping missiles to Hezbollah.

jonbenet, aclu, karr, bush, nsa, Anna Diggs Taylor, iran, hezbollah

Lies?!?!

Tuesday, August 15th, 2006

Recently the question was asked, “Why does the Globe-Republican (Amarillo Globe News) allow letter writers to blatantly lie?“  I would like to ask the newspaper the same question in regards to Jayne Farris’ recently published letter.

Ms. Farris makes many outlandish claims that can be construed as lies, willful ignorance, brain washing, or just plain mental deficiency.  Of these claims one of the most outlandish is this: “Democrats believe there should be fair and equitable taxation. Republicans believe that only the dwindling middle class should be taxed and the rich should be exempt.”

I wonder what fair and equitable taxation would be? Would that mean the current regressive tax system we have where the top 50% of wage earners pay approximately 96% of all individual income taxes, or does Ms. Farris want a flat tax for all wage earners?  I am curious where she would set the bar. 4% would be just as fair as 100% just as long as everyone is taxed that way.

Another gross misstatement by Ms Farris is this: “Democrats believe workers should be paid for their production. Republicans believe all workers should remain in bondage and CEOs should have golden parachutes.”

I would like to see where she draws her conclusions.  I have never heard anyone on the right say that people should “remain in bondage” in any form or fashion.  I would also like to know what her problem with “Golden Parachutes” are.  Wouldn’t it be nice to receive a $400 million retirement package?  Golden Parachutes and high executive salaries are what makes junior executives and lower employees productive.  CEO’s high earnings and large benefits packages are what people set their standards and goals by.  I learned this in my economics class this summer.  I am open to hear other opinions on the subject.

Somewhat out of sequence Farris makes the claim, “Democrats believe everyone should have access to health care. Republicans believe only the wealthy should have access to health care.”

This statement comes despite the fact that anyone can walk into an emergency room and receive more than adequate health care, no matter their income.  Everyone has access to healthcare and I am unaware of any legislation or talking points from any politician that says anyone but the rich should have access to healthcare.

Continuing, Farris writes, “Democrats believe there should be an energy policy. Republicans believe that what is good for the Bush family and Dick Cheney is good for the country.”

Now I could be missing something here, but voting to keep ANWR closed is not much of an energy policy, not to mention these lines leave “non sequitur” lingering in my mind.  I bet the mentioning of Bush and Cheney has something to do with Haliburton or “War for oil” rhetoric.  Come to think of it, Bush and Cheney, if the war really is for oil, have done far more to ensure our energy independence than any democrat has.  Maybe she is referring to Ted Kennedy’s Nantucket Sound energy policy.

So really, why does the Amarillo Globe News allow letter writers to blatantly lie?”

amarillo, Bush, Cheney, democrats, globe, healthcare, lies, news, republicans, rich, taxes

Partial Birth Abortion

Friday, August 11th, 2006

One of the greatest crimes of our century has been grossly misjudged Roe v. Wade case that legalized the systematic murder of children. Out of abortion has grown an even more barbaric practice, partial birth abortion. A accurate description of this procedure is worth seeing.
The Supreme Court has agreed to take a case out of California concerning the constitutionality of the national ban on partial-birth abortion. This is the second case involving the ban on partial-birth abortion that the high court has agreed to hear. As you may recall, Congress approved a national ban on the procedure. The law was challenged in three separate cases in the federal court system in Nebraska, New York, and California. In all cases, the ban was declared unconstitutional. The high court first agreed to hear the case out of Nebraska (see below). The ACLJ, which has been involved in defending the national ban since its passage by Congress, is supporting the government’s position defending the ban and is representing members of Congress in an amicus brief filed with the high court. Like the Nebraska case, the Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in CA case in the fall of 2006. The case is Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, 05-1382.
I just learned of this group tonight and the facts above, about this case are from there.
I have mentioned this channel before, and again there are many things here that I’m not interested in, but there are very good historical stories. There is also, a good news segment at 6pm. I heard this case was about to come before the Supreme Court tonight. It’s funny that I’ve not heard a word about it on any of the regular news programs. I was amazed to see Lawyer’s for the adlj speaking in a way that made me think that maybe there actually are lawyers, who really care about something besides a fat paycheck. They explored in detail this case. Lets hope that with the recent improvements in the court the absolutely horrendous act of partial birth abortion will finally be made a part of a tragic time of past history and not the future.

“Worst President Ever” discussion on Digg.com

Friday, August 11th, 2006

First, a reiteration of digg. Digg is a site that promotes user submitted content that spans a wide variety of topics. Sports, gaming, entertainment, technology, and my favorite, politics. I like the politics the most because a wide variety of opinions is dished up in one location.

Here is the original caption of this article”

Although George W. Bush is probably not the worst president in U.S. history (Woodrow Wilson may have that dubious honour), the president may be in contention for that title in the post-Second World War era.

The article isn’t the most iteresting part, it is the discussion on digg. Not only do the articles have a wide variety of content, bu the comments of each article have a wide variety of opinions as well. In this particular submission, commenters make the case for even worse presidents than GWB, such as Abraham Lincoln, FDR, Nixon, Carter, and probably lots more, I haven’t read all of the comments.

People get the most offended when others call out Lincoln or FDR. The usual response is that Lincoln took away more civil liberties than Bush ever dreamed about and that FDR enacted terrible welfar programs, social security, and could have done more to prevent WWII.

I thought about it for a little bit and the logic behind critisizing Lincoln and FDR seems pretty fair, in today’s standards however I don’t think the lens in which we look back at those presidents is ground correctly. No one knows if we would have been better or worse off had Lincoln not freed the slaves and rebuilt the union. I agree there might be a strong case that we would be worse off, but look at the constitutional laws that were broken at the time to get us where we are today. No one can really say with any degree of certainty if we would have been better off without social security and poor welfare programs. I agree there might be a strong case that we would be better off had better alternatives been implemented, but what alternatives, that were viable at the time, were better? Can we fix these problems today? No one can really say yes or no with any certainty.

As far as GWB goes, I say time will tell. I agree there is a strong case that he will be one of the worst if not the worst, but, as with other presidents, his actions will be dealt with for long periods of time after his presidency is over. Once the positive or negative outcomes of his actions are fully known and understood, then I think it will be fair to judge GWB. I can also understand that people want to prevent any negative outcomes of his presidency and I don’t fault them for that.

What do you think? Who do you think is the worst US president ever and why?

read more | digg story

worst, president, bush, lincoln, roosivelt, carter, digg


Official Ivory Dome T-Shirt On Sale Now

Thursday, August 10th, 2006

The shirt I have up there now is the black with white letters.  I would have put the white with black letters up but my browser choked and the design was lost.  I will see about remaking it.

Here is the link to purchase the shirt.  It is $22.45.  The white one, I think, is $16.45.  That is expensive, I know, but zazzle is the best place I know of that will do one off shirts like that.  You can also change the shirt if you want.  You can pick sizes and colors from red, green, grey blue and black. You could get a hoodie if that is what you like and there are a variety of women’s shirts and even an infant one piece.

ivory dome, shirt