Archive for May, 2006

Memorial Day

Monday, May 29th, 2006

Listening to Bill Bennett’s Morning in America this morning, I heard this quote from John Stuart Mill:

“War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. ”

Thank God for the men and women who rose to the challenge, especially those who paid the ultimate price. I’m reminded of the words to the song, We Were There: “No, it wasn’t always easy, it wasn’t always fair. But when Freedom called we answered, we were there.”

Thank God for young men like my son-in-law, a PV2 in the U.S. Army, who just finished his Advanced Individual Training and will be headed for Germany on June 12. I pray that he’ll never have to see combat, but I’m confident that if he does, he will proudly serve and protect.

Thank God for people like Bodacious and Celtictexan, both of whom have tasted the sting of battle in defense of our country.

On this Memorial Day, I feel humbled to be counted as a veteran among those who served their country in war, because in my 20 years of service, I never had to do so.

We are engaged in a war unlike any we have seen before. There is no Forward Edge of the Battle Area, the enemy doesn’t wear a recognizable uniform, and for the first time in more than a century, we are vulnerable on our own mainland. We must stay the course and prevail or run the risk of losing the freedoms that so many secured and defended for us in the past. Please take a moment and pray that we don’t lose our resolve.

Multiple Choice

Thursday, May 25th, 2006

Who said this and what is he/she talking about?

“Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.”

If you google the text I bet you can find the context, but you will notice it doesn’t change the fact that the speaker wants to “fix the facts around the policy” so to speak.

Is the speaker:

  1. George Bush
  2. Dick Cheney
  3. Bill Clinton
  4. Al Gore
  5. Condi Rice

Highlight below to see who it is:
(highlight)
Al Gore said this. Double standards anyone?
(/highlight)

Click here four the source.

Finally Countering the Left’s Lies….

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

…Peter Wehner, deputy assistant to the president and director of the White House’s Office of Strategic Initiatives, debunks the the anti-war myths that stopped living and became mixed-up democratic talking points.

It is a good, short read but misses a couple of things, like the myth that Saddam’s Iraq had no connection to terrorism. However, the liberals will dismiss all of this. If it came from the white house it is a lie. They will never believe any link to terrorism, either, given that day after day in Iraq non-uniformed “insurgents” routinely murder innocent civilians in an effort to dissuade people from supporting the American backed government. If that isn’t the definition of terrorism then I don’t know what is.

Saddam paid suicide bomber’s families for successful attacks on Israelies. That is supporting terrorism as well as a well known fact. Or maybe liberals are of the notion that most fanatic islamists are of, the notion that Israeli’s (or even infidel’s) lives are worth less than than that of a Muslim’s. That notion could be one possible explination for not considering Saddam’s support for terrorists terrorism. The liberal talking point for this talking point is that is not enough to justify pre-emptive invasion. Fine. Take a look at Abu-Nidal, Salman Pak, and slew of other recently translated paper’s from Saddam’s Iraq.

I also think this resurgence of justifying the Iraq attack is due to our growing success over there. I am not sure of the exact number, but recall reading that with the exception of one month, the deaths in Iraq have been steadily declining for something more than 10 months. That fact, combined with the new Iraq governemt becoming more sovereign and the new Iraqi army becoming more self-sufficient every day, goes to show how good we are doing over there and the liberals hate it. The liberals hate it because if Iraq succedes, that means Bush succedes. If Bush succedes, the left looses. =D

Update: Just in case you ever doubt Saddam’s support and ties to terror, here is everything you will ever need to know. The part I like best is citation 22 that says: Court Rules: Al Qaida, Iraq Linked.

The Phone Call That None of Us Will Hear

Wednesday, May 17th, 2006

- Hello?
- Allah akhbar!
- Omar, what are you doing, calling me on my cell phone? Do you want to get us both killed?
- Not to worry, Ahmed! I switched by carrier to Qwest. No one will ever even know about this call, much eavesdrop on our conversation.
- Right you are. I switched to Qwest, too. So, now that we can speak freely, what the latest plan from Osama? IED’s, suicide missions, dirty bombs?
- Better than that! Al Qaeda’s come up with something called “Plan B”.
- Plan B? What’s that?
- It’s a brilliant idea, really. Psychological warfare against the infidels. In the first phase, we eradicate all memories of the Great Attack of September 11. Our operatives in newsrooms throughout the West have been hiding, and in some cases erasing all video evidence that it ever took place. They’ll also make sure that those photos from Abu Ghraib are shown as often as possible. Others have been strategically attending previews of that terrible movie “Flight 93,” shouting “Too soon! Too soon!” at appropriate times.
- Sounds interesting! Go on.
- Once our real intentions have been concealed, we’ll direct the West’s hatred toward the real Satan: George W. Bush. You know how effective chants are in working people into a frenzy: “Bush lied! People died! Bush lied! People died!” Before long, the crowds will hate Bush as much as we hate those Zionist pigs. Once that blind rage takes hold, there’ll be no stopping it. Anything will justify bringing down Bush. Mothers will embrace their sons’ killers. Jihadists who behead Westerners and blow up Iraqi women and children will be hailed as freedom fighters. Intelligence officers will compromise sources and methods to willing members of the media, and as the public cheers that they know all the state secrets, so will we! Never again will we have to forge documents to bring Bush down, like we tried with that National Guard memo in 2004. The people will automatically blame Bush for everything: natural disasters, skyrocketing gas prices, bird flu – you name it, it’s Bush’s fault.
- What about acceptance of Islam?
- We’ll project our less popular beliefs onto the Christians. Our friends in the media will convince everyone that “death to the sodomizers” is an aberration of True Islam, while at the same time portraying those Baptists in Kansas with their “God Hates Fags” signs as mainstream Christianity. Why, after awhile, I’ll bet even Bush himself will embrace Islam as the Religion of Peace!
- Omar, have you lost it? Are you trying to tell me that the infidels will support us over their own culture without the threat of imminent death hanging over their head?
- Maybe you’re right, Ahmed. Besides, if we could convert the West without jihad, we’d miss out on those 70 virgins. So, what’s it going to be: IED’s, suicide missions, dirty bombs …

Welcome!: To the Readers of The Amarillo Independent!

Monday, May 8th, 2006

If you read the latest issue of the Amarillo Independent and followed the link on the bottom of the sign I held that was contained in the grossly misrepresented photograph of me on page 5 of said edition then I bid you greetings!

You have stumbled upon my personal political blog. Here, I dish out my conservative opinion for everyone to see and criticize if they feel the need.

Hey, guess what? Like the description of me in the photograph said, I was in Iraq on day 1 of OIF. But, I support the war! Doesn’t that make you anti-war people cringe, that I could be so ignorant and dumb? You will be pleased to know that I voted for Bush as well, still support OIF and the War on Terror, and approve of the job our troops are doing over there.

So please, take your time, browse through what I have to say, and speak your mind as you please. I promise not to write down what you say, word for word, then publish the exact opposite of what you said, unlike David Bowser, who did just that.

But hey, bad publicity is free publicity. Thanks, Mr Bowser, for the free adspace in your newspaper.

My Opinion on the Moussaoui Verdict

Thursday, May 4th, 2006

I honestly think justice was serverd.

Cox & Forkum and I are on the same track.

For one, as being in solitary for 23 hours out of the day will be hell on earth, and I agree with other people I heard speak about it; I would rather die right now than put up with 23 hours by myself in a jail cell every day until my death.

For two, he would have to be in solitary, because the inmates would kill him otherwise.

For three, I don’t think he should be put to death, because if we do kill him, he will become a martyr to the islamic fanatics. Not to mention all the appeals he will recieve, the headlines those will cause, and the more drawn out this whole thing will be if he were to be executed. If we were to kill him now, I speculate a lot of Americans would dance on his grave. Not that I think that is wrong for some of the 9/11 famlies to do, but us dancing on his grave will empower the terrorists even more. He will die with a whimper, just as the judge told him. 40, 50 years from now, if he hasn’t killed himself by then, when he dies a decrepid old man, not a soul will care. Tomorrow Moussaoui will be remembered just as Scott Peterson is remembered today.

Counter Protesting the Protest

Thursday, May 4th, 2006

On Saturday, April 29, 2006, at about 10am, I counter protested an anti-war protest after learning about the event from the “Truth” squad and another local activist group’s website. I got the idea from one of my favorite websites (although the forums aren’t very flattering) http://www.protestwarrior.com/. I created, from their site, what I thought would be a suitable counter protest sign, donned my authentic Iraqi smagh as well as my USMC issue cammies, and hit the streets.
Truth be told, I was quite nervous, as I had never participated in an event like that ever before. Also, I was disappointed because I was the youngest person there. I thought for sure there would be some misguided college students there. However, I soon realized that any college student of the liberal persuasion would be fast asleep at 10 am. The only attendees, besides me, were old hippies from the Vietnam era. Of course there were a few others there, but for the most part, old hippies were the composition of the crowd.
I stood among their signs, blending in at first. What I assume is the organizer of the event approached me, shook my hand and I shook his, he read my sign and I read his, and we smiled. He asked me how I was and I told him I was fine. I told him thank you for not asking me to leave. He said, “We all have our own opinions.” I told him I respected his efforts and his opinion and that I was out here being the voice of opposition, to make the playing field somewhat fair and balanced.
The event continued and I was taken many a picture of, by one photographer and a couple of video cameras. I found out later I was on the evening news. After that all the hippies went and sang songs and read poetry. It was very strange. My brother in law showed up at about 10:45 after I invited him out there. I stayed there until about 11:30 and as some other people left I left as well.
After the event I had regretted making the sign I did and wished I had made another one. I had to explain to my brother and another anti-war person there what the sign meant. I think other people there were of that persuasion as well. As a result, the next one of these I go to I am going to make a different sign that will be more clear cut as to what its meaning is.

Unlimited Gasoline

Thursday, May 4th, 2006

I heard on the radio today about a company making a still to create pure ethanol from farm grown crops for use in motor vehicles. The radio program said that the cost for a gallon of ethanol using this method was about $0.75 a gallon, seventy five cents.
This is extremely attractive to me, but I know that it is not as simple as throwing some corn into a barrel, waiting a few hours, and gassing my car up whenever I need to. No, the startup cost for a simple operation, even for personal use, would be enormous. The stills must be a few thousand dollars, combined with the diligence of growing enough crops to feed that thing, and keeping the fuel flowing, you are looking at a full time operation to keep your vehicle gassed up with your own stuff all the time.
The benefits of producing this fuel are extremely attractive however. The cost, combined with not having to go to the pump, and a lot of other stuff. For example, if and individual could start their own operation and if that operation didn’t take 24/7 dedication, then I think it would be attractive to a lot of people, especially as the price of gasoline increases. This stuff is basic economics. If there is a suitable substitute at a lower price people will buy a lot of it. Gasoline vendors will be forced to compete. The possibilities are limitless and I am going to seriously consider it.